Has anybody experienced this problem. I have a series of tests cases for
a component that uses activemq. They basically use queues, with send
and receiveNoWait. Whereas the tests run without problem on my W2K box I
cannot get them to always complete successfully on the Linux box. The
problem i
nmittler wrote:
>
> If you want your consumer (even a durable one) to receive the messages, it
> would have to have been registered on the topic before the message was
> sent. At that point, you could kill your consumer and bring it back up
> and
> it will get the messages it missed.
>
> The
Hi all,
We use fanout transport in our production system. For our tests we need to
specify minAckCount as 1 since we bring up only one broker during tests. How
to do that?
Env: activemq-4.1.1, lingo-1.3
Thanks,
Madhav
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FanoutTransport---ho
Hi all,
We're having problems running a cluster of brokers (AMQ 4.1.1) with
auto-discovery. We're using auto-discovery via multicast both for the JMS
clients and for the network-of-brokers. Our architecture is as follows:
There are 4 clients, and 2 brokers. The clients are configured like this:
Could you provide the C++ code? Also what platform and compiler?
Rob Davies wrote:
the c++ code must be passing in a null value for the destination name
On Jul 21, 2007, at 4:16 PM, seamuskerrigan wrote:
I have succesfully set-up and ran the activemq-cpp example. However,
when I
try integr
the c++ code must be passing in a null value for the destination name
On Jul 21, 2007, at 4:16 PM, seamuskerrigan wrote:
I have succesfully set-up and ran the activemq-cpp example.
However, when I
try integrating the HelloWorldProducer into an existing C++
process, I've
been running into p
