hi James
Both the producer and consumers are managed by Spring. They are not run as
threads, so there is only one instance of each.
The producer test code:
public void testSend() {
Producer producer = (Producer)
Context.instance().getBean("queueProducer");
for (int i
Hi all,
I am trying to embed the activemq-rar 4.1.1 into JBoss 4.0.5GA. I
followed the direction here
http://devzone.logicblaze.com/site/integrating-apache-activemq-with-jboss.html
and used tcp instead of vm since ultimately I'll have clustering and fail
over. I receive the following error whe
Hello Sir,
Actually our producer was running on a very slower machine...so thats why we
got very bad results.
But your advices really helped us. Stomp is the fastest and for queue we are
getting results upto 1500 msges/sec :)...more than sufficient for us.
Thanking you for your help !!
Mittl
I haven't heard back from anyone on this.
I think it may be related to being an embedded broker in Tomcat but
unsure.
Anyone have any ideas how to fix this?
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Garner, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 12:48 PM
To: users@activemq.apa
We've now got separate development and user mailing lists for Camel...
http://cwiki.apache.org/CAMEL/mailing-lists.html
Hopefully we'll have the nabble archive/forum for these lists setup shortly
--
James
---
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
On 5/22/07, dr.jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes.
Also, ServiceMix EIP had xpath splitter, which I didn't see in Camel?
Thats more a case of bad documentation :) I've tried to fix that...
http://cwiki.apache.org/CAMEL/splitter.html
e.g.
from("activemq:foo.bar").splitter(xpath("//foo/bar")
Yes.
Also, ServiceMix EIP had xpath splitter, which I didn't see in Camel?
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> ...
> We should probably
> integrate Camel into ServiceMix as the preferred EIP solution and
> consider deprecating (or at least merging) the ServiceMix EIP
> functionality.
>
> --
> James
>
On 5/22/07, dr.jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is the relation of Camel to ServiceMix-EIP?
Is one somehow the historical ancestor of the other?
Or are they intended to be equivalent functionality, but in different
settings?
ServiceMix EIP was the ancestor; they both do similar things. The
What is the relation of Camel to ServiceMix-EIP?
Is one somehow the historical ancestor of the other?
Or are they intended to be equivalent functionality, but in different
settings?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-camel--tf3796253s2354.html#a10737590
Sent from the Active
Hi folks,
this is along the lines of what Franz was asking in "Master/Slave
Configuration With Non-Persistence - 2 Brokers Starting Problem", but I
didn't want to hijack his thread in case it wasn't related.
what I'm looking for is:
* Pure master/slave share nothing
* transparent failover in the
On 5/22/07, Jeff Gunther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We did some load testing today and noticed some performance issues
with the JmsComponent. Based on some research, it appears that
Spring's SingleConnectionFactory might improve performance.
Sorry about that - we should have big flashing warnin
Hi All,
Please can you tell me if it possible to register an interceptor that can be
alerted each time a message is PUT, GET or BROWSED etc from a queue.
Thanks alot
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Broker-Interceptors-tf3795670s2354.html#a10735791
Sent from the ActiveMQ
On 5/22/07, massive.boisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I couldn't find anywhere information about how to check if a topic (or
destination) has already been created on broker by another client.
You can browse JMX.
http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-monitor-activemq.html
Incidentally why d
Hi, I couldn't find anywhere information about how to check if a topic (or
destination) has already been created on broker by another client.
Any pointers/help?
Thanks in advance,
--MB
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/check-if-topic-already-created-tf3795151s2354.html#a1
On 5/22/07, warwick.mayson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the fast response!
I am using activemq 4.1.1
The producer, consumer and activemq conf is attached
I have test class that simply loops i number of times calling
producer.send("msg#" + i) and the trace on the consumer.onMessag
Franz Garsombke wrote:
>
> I have a situation where we want to have a non-persistent topic and run a
> master/slave configuration with our brokers. The problem is that if we
> define the broker as non-persistent a broker is started on each server in
> our cluster. Without defining something lik
Hi
Thanks for the fast response!
I am using activemq 4.1.1
The producer, consumer and activemq conf is attached
I have test class that simply loops i number of times calling
producer.send("msg#" + i) and the trace on the consumer.onMessage() method
displays all even numbered messages followed
17 matches
Mail list logo