Re: [camel] Service Interface

2007-05-14 Thread Rob Davies
On 15 May 2007, at 07:20, James Strachan wrote: On 5/15/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/14/07, Jeff Gunther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm developing a component/endpoint that implements a FTP server. Great! > When the user uploads a file to the server, the endpoint will

Re: [camel] Service Interface

2007-05-14 Thread James Strachan
On 5/15/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/14/07, Jeff Gunther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm developing a component/endpoint that implements a FTP server. Great! > When the user uploads a file to the server, the endpoint will deposit > the file into a queue. Currently, the En

Re: [camel] Service Interface

2007-05-14 Thread James Strachan
On 5/14/07, Jeff Gunther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm developing a component/endpoint that implements a FTP server. Great! When the user uploads a file to the server, the endpoint will deposit the file into a queue. Currently, the Endpoint implements the Service interface. I've noticed that

Re: Are messages lost if a stomp producer is quick

2007-05-14 Thread panu
Hi, First of all, thank you for responding to my questions. I use the same socket to send the messages, and they are sent sequentially. On the producer side, all 100 messages are sent successfully (no exception and the size of the messages returned are OK). However, on the broker side, fewer

[camel] Service Interface

2007-05-14 Thread Jeff Gunther
I'm developing a component/endpoint that implements a FTP server. When the user uploads a file to the server, the endpoint will deposit the file into a queue. Currently, the Endpoint implements the Service interface. I've noticed that the "stop" method is not being called when the CamelCont

question about consumer.prority meaning

2007-05-14 Thread Dominique DE VITO
Hi, I am wondering about JMS consumer.prority meaning (mentionned in http://activemq.apache.org/consumer-priority.html ) - is it a priority defining concurrency between possible consumers of the *same* messages ? OR - is it a priority defining (CPU) concurrency between all the consumers ?

Re: Are messages lost if a stomp producer is quick

2007-05-14 Thread James Strachan
On 5/14/07, panu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Guys, I just downloaded ActiveMQ SNAPSHOT v.4.2.0 last night and tried a simple test with Stomp Python (stomp.py). That is, I ran a producer sending 100 of 1K messages consecutively (without any pause) to a queue. Things went OK when I ran the

Server push streaming from ActiveMQ with NIO

2007-05-14 Thread Martin Perez
Hi lads, Is there a way to support NIO from ActiveMQ? I'm trying to do server push data streaming to a desktop Java application but I always reach the thread-per connection constraint in the server side so the maximum number of concurrent sessions that I can spawn is just the OS limit 1000, 2000

Re: Problem for installin ActiveMQ CPP on MAC OS X Tiger

2007-05-14 Thread didyeah971
As I said this my config too, and mac ports, and cppunits are installed in opt/local/lib. I am really lost now... Did didyeah971 wrote: > > Yes this my configuration too... > > nmittler wrote: >> >> I've just upgraded my darwinports to the latest macports (renamed) >> v1.440and also upgraded c

Combining MasterSlave and network of brokers

2007-05-14 Thread PieterN
Hi, I want to combine a master/slave technology with a network of brokers. The idea is to have a central master/slave combination, and a remote ActiveMQ server connected to the master/slave. The Master/Slave should always be available, messages posted to the remote server are less important, that

Re: ActiveMQ 4.1.1 MS SQL Server 2005

2007-05-14 Thread Jamie McCrindle
Hi, As far as I'm aware you have two options: either switch off locking in your jdbc adapter (http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03257.html) or try the code attached to this defect: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1086. If you choose to switch off locking, Pure JDBC M

Re: Problem for installin ActiveMQ CPP on MAC OS X Tiger

2007-05-14 Thread didyeah971
Yes this my configuration too... nmittler wrote: > > I've just upgraded my darwinports to the latest macports (renamed) > v1.440and also upgraded cppunit and the automake tools and everything > works for > me. My guess is that there must be a problem with your installation of > macports. For