On 15 May 2007, at 07:20, James Strachan wrote:
On 5/15/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/14/07, Jeff Gunther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm developing a component/endpoint that implements a FTP server.
Great!
> When the user uploads a file to the server, the endpoint will
On 5/15/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/14/07, Jeff Gunther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm developing a component/endpoint that implements a FTP server.
Great!
> When the user uploads a file to the server, the endpoint will deposit
> the file into a queue. Currently, the En
On 5/14/07, Jeff Gunther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm developing a component/endpoint that implements a FTP server.
Great!
When the user uploads a file to the server, the endpoint will deposit
the file into a queue. Currently, the Endpoint implements the Service
interface. I've noticed that
Hi,
First of all, thank you for responding to my questions. I use the same
socket to send the messages, and they are sent sequentially. On the producer
side, all 100 messages are sent successfully (no exception and the size of
the messages returned are OK). However, on the broker side, fewer
I'm developing a component/endpoint that implements a FTP server.
When the user uploads a file to the server, the endpoint will deposit
the file into a queue. Currently, the Endpoint implements the Service
interface. I've noticed that the "stop" method is not being called
when the CamelCont
Hi,
I am wondering about JMS consumer.prority meaning (mentionned in
http://activemq.apache.org/consumer-priority.html )
- is it a priority defining concurrency between possible consumers of
the *same* messages ?
OR
- is it a priority defining (CPU) concurrency between all the consumers ?
On 5/14/07, panu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Guys,
I just downloaded ActiveMQ SNAPSHOT v.4.2.0 last night and tried a
simple test with Stomp Python (stomp.py). That is, I ran a producer sending
100 of 1K messages consecutively (without any pause) to a queue. Things went
OK when I ran the
Hi lads,
Is there a way to support NIO from ActiveMQ?
I'm trying to do server push data streaming to a desktop Java application
but I always reach the thread-per connection constraint in the server side
so the maximum number of concurrent sessions that I can spawn is just the OS
limit 1000, 2000
As I said this my config too, and mac ports, and cppunits are installed in
opt/local/lib. I am really lost now...
Did
didyeah971 wrote:
>
> Yes this my configuration too...
>
> nmittler wrote:
>>
>> I've just upgraded my darwinports to the latest macports (renamed)
>> v1.440and also upgraded c
Hi,
I want to combine a master/slave technology with a network of brokers. The
idea is to have a central master/slave combination, and a remote ActiveMQ
server connected to the master/slave. The Master/Slave should always be
available, messages posted to the remote server are less important, that
Hi,
As far as I'm aware you have two options: either switch off locking in
your jdbc adapter
(http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03257.html)
or try the code attached to this defect:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1086.
If you choose to switch off locking, Pure JDBC M
Yes this my configuration too...
nmittler wrote:
>
> I've just upgraded my darwinports to the latest macports (renamed)
> v1.440and also upgraded cppunit and the automake tools and everything
> works for
> me. My guess is that there must be a problem with your installation of
> macports. For
12 matches
Mail list logo