Hi,
I am trying to setup ActiveMQ with XMPP support, but I get this exception:
2007-03-09 19:31:47,656 ERROR ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:3940
[org.apache.activemq.transport.xmpp.XmppTransport] -
javax.xml.stream.XMLStreamException
at com.bea.xml.stream.MXParser.fillBuf(MXParser
Hi all,
The xmpp example page on the wiki shows how to connect and start a
conversation using topics. Any ideas how to use a queue instead?
Thanks,
Abdullah
Folks,
I am using a fairly recent 4.2 SNAPSHOT
(apache-activemq-4.2-20070226.071451-14).
I am using the activemq-rar file from lib/optional and installing that to a
JBOSS server. It comes up and runs and seems to work fine. I am now trying
to configure the embedded broker to use the jaasAuthenti
I'm sending large files (50-100 MB) using ActiveMQInputStreams. Everything
works fine as long as there are no redelivered messages. When there are,
the redelivered messages are in reverse order...
# brokers: 1
destination: topic (w/ a durable subscriber)
version: ActiveMQ-4.1.0
So I start rec
Hi James,
I've tried with the last SNAPSHOP and the JDBC MASTER-SLAVE behavior was the
expected. The first broker becomes MASTER and the second broker waits until
the MASTER releases the lock.
Thank you!
Matías.
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 3/8/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am using activemq-rar-4.1-SNAPSHOT.rar Maybe that is not recent enough.
Still I am not too worried about that one as I can easily upgrade at a later
date or just build the source.
I think you are right with the null pointer, not a top error though. I will
try and get that working.
The external
Hello active Mq users ,
is there any way out to overcome journal locked exceptions ? please help
me out.
I am getting a journal Locked Exception , when ever I re start tomcat.
How come the journal is still locked , when the broker is stopped.
The following is the exception
org.apache.activeio
I'm using Bitronix Transaction Manager for all TX related operations. It
provides me with a class that will manage the JmsConnectionFactory by
wrapping it in a ConnectionPool. All access to the ConnectionFactory is
managed by this class.
${jms.connection.fact
Just a note that this turned out to be the Spark client itself. James
added a note on the wiki showing how to turn off auto discovery of
server/port so shouldn't be an issue anymore.
On 3/9/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW do you see any DEBUG statements showing that the XMPP tr
BTW do you see any DEBUG statements showing that the XMPP transport in
ActiveMQ is receiving messages over XMPP?
On 3/9/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you sure there's not a firewall or something between your Spark
client and the broker?
On 3/9/07, Abdullah Jibaly <[EMAIL PRO
Are you sure there's not a firewall or something between your Spark
client and the broker?
On 3/9/07, Abdullah Jibaly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's the only exception I saw when I changed the log level to debug:
DEBUG ManagementContext - Failed to create local registry
java.lan
On 3/9/07, cmathrusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, the change to port 2100 was intentional. The activemq.xml file on the
server was updated to this value. If it hadn't been I would not have been
able to connect to it.
My server application is using the JmsTemplate but that is not the issue a
On 3/9/07, AsaUK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi James,
I am working along with Nic on this one. I have uploaded the rar file fine
with the only parameter set being BrokerXmlConfig as
"broker:(tcp://localhost:61616)" I can then connect to the appserver jms
from an outside client using 4.0.x (can
Here's the only exception I saw when I changed the log level to debug:
DEBUG ManagementContext - Failed to create local registry
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: mx4j.tools.naming.NamingService
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:200)
at java.security.
Yes, the change to port 2100 was intentional. The activemq.xml file on the
server was updated to this value. If it hadn't been I would not have been
able to connect to it.
My server application is using the JmsTemplate but that is not the issue as
I am using ConnectionPooling.
I've managed to g
On 3/9/07, ananner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is the broker considered "remote" if it is running in embedded mode? The
broker is run outside of the WAR, but as "vm://localhost".
It might be - depending on the classloaders
--
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Is the broker considered "remote" if it is running in embedded mode? The
broker is run outside of the WAR, but as "vm://localhost".
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 3/9/07, ananner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've deployed the ActiveMQ web console on Geronimo, but I'm not sure how
>
I'm a bit stumped on this one. All I can think of right now is you
enable debug logging in the log4j.properties file and see if that
helps any
On 3/9/07, Abdullah Jibaly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is a screenshot showing the error I'm getting, as well as my activemq.xml:
http://ac
Does Activemq have the capability of delaying the delivery of the messages.
Here is something we would like to do in our retry logic.
Get a message from queue and talk to the backend.
If there is an error from the backend, post a retry message back to the
queue.
But we would like the message se
On 3/9/07, ananner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've deployed the ActiveMQ web console on Geronimo, but I'm not sure how to
go about having the console connect to the existing BrokerService that is
running Geronimo.
The web console doesn't yet support connecting to remote brokers.
(Though i
Hi,
I've deployed the ActiveMQ web console on Geronimo, but I'm not sure how to
go about having the console connect to the existing BrokerService that is
running Geronimo. In the WEB-INF/applicationContext.xml, I've commented out
the BrokerService bean, since I do not want to start another Broke
On 3/9/07, LiXiao2007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would to change the name of the message listener thread for better
debugging. Current all the message listener threads share same name
"ActiveMQ Session Task". Could someone tell me a way to change the name?
You could try patching the ActiveMQ
On 3/9/07, LiXiao2007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does Activemq have the capability of delaying the delivery of the messages.
We don't yet support arbitrary delayed message delivery...
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-499
Here is something we would like to do in our retry logic.
G
I forgot to mention, I also tried that simpleAuthenticationPlugin
sample, put it in my activemq.xml but the command agent then fails to
startup. I'm running off of the svn trunk and built activemq using
maven.
Thanks,
Abdullah
On 3/9/07, Abdullah Jibaly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi James,
Tha
Hi James,
Thanks for the response. The method you outlined is exactly what I
want to use it for. However, I think my question is much more basic:
In the xmpp page you have an example with spark, using a username and
password right? How do I configure a username and password is my
question? I trie
Hi James,
I am working along with Nic on this one. I have uploaded the rar file fine
with the only parameter set being BrokerXmlConfig as
"broker:(tcp://localhost:61616)" I can then connect to the appserver jms
from an outside client using 4.0.x (can't use 4.1 as the rar does not have
openwire v
Juergen Mayrbaeurl wrote:
> Can you tell me something about the mentioned ways to get it worked? How does
> this work with RMI based EJB access? We don't have this problems with our
> JBoss servers.
>
> Kind regards
> Juergen
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1164
So, if you configure
Sorry to bother you guys again, but this feature (message expiration) is
really important for my needs.
So if you can explain what the non-persitent delivery mode has to do with my
problem, it will help me a lot.
Thx in advance,
Terry
Suchitha Koneru (sukoneru) wrote:
>
> What is the delivery
BTW I'm replying but taking future discussions over to the dev list...
On 3/9/07, Javier Leyba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/8/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BTW it would be pretty useful to have a pure properties files based
> way to configure the broker! Fancy starting it
On 3/8/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW it would be pretty useful to have a pure properties files based
way to configure the broker! Fancy starting it off and we can improve
it?
James
Well, I need to do it for me so, if it could be useful for others...
I know how load prop
On 3/9/07, nicpillinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we deploy the activemq resource adaptor how do we configure the embedded
broker?
How do we actually get the broker running and listening on 61616 from inside
the app server?
Its described on this page
http://activemq.apache.org/resource-adap
On 3/9/07, Gaurav Hariani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see that irrespective of the number of clients connected to a broker
or the number of messages being sent (or the size of messages)
the JMX Console reports that the broker is using 20Mb of Non-Heap Memory
... is this a limit by design ... can
On 3/9/07, tabshift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Rob,
sorry, maybe a silly question, but I think my messages not to be
"non-persistent".
So what makes a messsage "persistent"?
The delivery mode specified on the MessageProducer. (They are
persistent by default).
I am using a simple script t
I see that irrespective of the number of clients connected to a broker
or the number of messages being sent (or the size of messages)
the JMX Console reports that the broker is using 20Mb of Non-Heap Memory
... is this a limit by design ... can I increase this limit to improve
throughput?
Chan
Hi Rob,
sorry, maybe a silly question, but I think my messages not to be
"non-persistent".
So what makes a messsage "persistent"?
I am using a simple script that produces a number of text-messages.
While testing an other JMS-System my messages stayed in that store until
they were consumed.
TIA
there's tmp storage for non-persistent messages that have overflowed
the VM - even if that area is empty - its always cleared down on a re-
start - and that's what the message at start-up refers to
cheers,
Rob Davies
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
On 9 Mar 2007, at 10:08, tabshift wrote:
Hi all,
using ActiveMQ-4.2-Snapshot.
After starting the broker and posting a message to a queue I get
INFO KahaStore - Kaha Store successfully deleted data
directory activemq-data/hatest1/tmp_storage
and my former filled queues are empty.
I set deleteAllMessagesOnStartup="
If we deploy the activemq resource adaptor how do we configure the embedded
broker?
How do we actually get the broker running and listening on 61616 from inside
the app server?
Once it's actually running what's the process for getting a normal mdb wired
up to listen to a queue/topic on the embedde
Can you tell me something about the mentioned ways to get it worked? How does
this work with RMI based EJB access? We don't have this problems with our
JBoss servers.
Kind regards
Juergen
Christopher G. Stach II wrote:
>
> Juergen Mayrbaeurl wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> We're running ActiveMQ Version
Sorry I forget to mention that 'our' machines are the machines of the
customer. They do the installations and it's always a little bit tricky to
get 'new' components installed.
Juergen
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 3/9/07, Juergen Mayrbaeurl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks! Unfortunatel
On 3/8/07, Abdullah Jibaly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having trouble setting up ActiveMQ as a Jabber server. I tried to
follow the directions on the xmpp page but there are lots of holes in
it. For example, how do I configure the username/password, where do i
set those up? Has anyone
On 3/9/07, Juergen Mayrbaeurl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks! Unfortunately we don't have Java 5 needed by JManage 2.0 on our
machines.
You could always install it?
(James ducks :-)
--
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
BTW your code uses this...
props.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,
"org.apache.activemq.jndi.ActiveMQInitialContextFactory");
props.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, "tcp://localhost:2100");
thats the host/port used to connect to the broker. Have you changed
the active
43 matches
Mail list logo