On 3/1/07, Kelly Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to do this same thing in the current
codebase (4.1/4.2). Basically I just want to purge all queues at the
beginning of a unit test to ensure a clean start. I have a local vm://
broker and would prefer not to go thro
On 5/15/06, Adrian Tarau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know the utility of JMX, I use it :) But right now I don't want to
activate JMX. I saw that ActiveMQ use MX4J 2.1.1(why don't use 3.0.1?)
and I have already in my application MX4J 3.0.1 libraries and I remember
I used 3.0.1 with a project that
The memory model is different for ActiveMQ 4.1 in that for Queues,
only small references to the Queue messages are held in memory. This
means that the Queue depth can be considerably bigger than for
ActiveMQ 3.2.x.
However, our next major release (5.0 nee 4.2) has a more robust model
in tha
As many of you know, some of the previous versions of ActiveMQ, specifically
that I know of, ActiveMQ 3.2.1 had 'Queue is Full' error problem where after
some persistant messages are stored, the broker results in an error 'queue
is full' and consequently becomes unresponsive.
How is this fixed in
I'm trying to figure out how to do this same thing in the current
codebase (4.1/4.2). Basically I just want to purge all queues at the
beginning of a unit test to ensure a clean start. I have a local vm://
broker and would prefer not to go through JMX to do this.
Thanks,
Kelly
On 5/17/06, Hiram
On 3/1/07, didyeah971 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry but I have one more question, i can i test the web module, do i have
to download each file from the from svn, because i don't find it anywhere
else. that's why i'm interested in, it's the ajax connectors.
thx, did
I've updated the web sa
Sorry but I have one more question, i can i test the web module, do i have
to download each file from the from svn, because i don't find it anywhere
else. that's why i'm interested in, it's the ajax connectors.
thx, did
didyeah971 wrote:
>
> I just tested the code and it runs great now, thanks
I just tested the code and it runs great now, thanks a lot. Now i'll be able
to test other ways to use it.
Did
didyeah971 wrote:
>
> almost the methods have been recognized execept in the "run" method,
> org.apache.activemq.broker.impl.Main.main(args) doesn't seem to exist. I
> tried with the ec
Damn dodgy code! :) I figured from the imports at the top of the code
it wasn't using anything else in ActiveMQ.
I've patched the code to remove the explicit broker creation (and used
the vm://localhost transport instead).
http://cwiki.apache.org/ACTIVEMQ/hello-world.html
On 3/1/07, didyeah971
almost the methods have been recognized execept in the "run" method,
org.apache.activemq.broker.impl.Main.main(args) doesn't seem to exist. I
tried with the eclipse completion, and i found no package or class named
broker.impl
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 3/1/07, didyeah971 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 3/1/07, didyeah971 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, i just saw the wiki, i compared the codes, and it seems to be the same so
i copied and there is still this error and on the
org.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory. Maybe it takes a while to be
uptdated, so i'll look later.
It takes a while t
Ok, i just saw the wiki, i compared the codes, and it seems to be the same so
i copied and there is still this error and on the
org.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory. Maybe it takes a while to be
uptdated, so i'll look later.
Anyway thx for answering so fast.
Did
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 3/
On 3/1/07, didyeah971 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tested the example located here http://activemq.apache.org/hello-world.html
That explains it. I thought you were using one of the examples that
ship with the release.
, using this version "apache-activemq-4.1.0-incubator".
I don't think this
I tested the example located here http://activemq.apache.org/hello-world.html
, using this version "apache-activemq-4.1.0-incubator".
I don't think this example is from an old 3.x version, otherwise, there
would be a little error on the activemq website.
Actually, only the org.apache.activemq are
Thanks
I am not to bothered about the JMS spec since I use ActiveMQ and some of its
features internally to my applicaiton and so will not be switching to
another JMS provider. Obviously if I did write software that allowed any
choice of a JMS provider then I would need to make certain methods thr
I've just successfully built the code both from the downloaded the tar.gz as
well as a direct extract from svn. How did you get the 1.1 source?
On 3/1/07, Yigal K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've downloaded the new ActiveMQ-CPP and tried to compile it under linux
with 'make' and recieved t
Which version are you using? The package name has been
org.apache.activemq for quite some time (since version 4.x). Are you
sure you're not using example programs from an old 3.x version of
activemq?
On 3/1/07, didyeah971 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just installed ActiveMQ, i launched a produc
On 3/1/07, Albert Strasheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007, Paul French wrote:
> Is ActiveMQMessageProducer.send thread safe?
You might want to check the JMS specification, but from what I remember,
you can share a Connection between threads, but everything from a
Ses
I just installed ActiveMQ, i launched a producer and a consumer and
everithing ran ok but when i tried to compile the helloworld example
(App.java) that is on the website, the "org.activemq" is not recognized
neither by eclipse nor in command line.
I added it the activemq.jar (actually it's
apache
Hi all
this is (hopefully finally) an optimization topic:
Each message I consume takes ~30 seconds to complete, thus
to increase throughput I'm trying to get as many threads
as possible to process them in parallel.
Right now I have configured Jencks to use 300 threads,
with the following Activa
Hello all
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007, Paul French wrote:
> Is ActiveMQMessageProducer.send thread safe?
You might want to check the JMS specification, but from what I remember,
you can share a Connection between threads, but everything from a
Session on down (i.e. everything you make from a Session a
Is ActiveMQMessageProducer.send thread safe?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Is-ActiveMQMessageProducer.send-thread-safe--tf3325927s2354.html#a9246594
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
22 matches
Mail list logo
