I guess a good work around is to switch to a different database; such
as using MySQL or Postgresql
On 2/28/07, Suchitha Koneru (sukoneru) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Active MQ users ,
I have an embedded broker described by the following
java class. It is started as a ser
Hello Active MQ users ,
I have an embedded broker described by the following
java class. It is started as a servletContextlistener , in tomcat 5.5
public class ActiveMQBrokerStartListener implements
ServletContextListener {
BrokerService broker = new BrokerService();
public v
I wonder if you could try reproducing this issue on the latest 4.1
branch - as we will release 4.1.1 soon with some fixes in this area
On 2/21/07, David Kendall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am testing failover scenarios with ActiveMq 4.1 and with Shared File
System
Master Slave. The failover se
Great. Thanks for letting us know
On 2/27/07, Iakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/26/07, Iakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> James.Strachan wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2/26/07, Iakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> hi,
>> >>
>> >> i am running a client which concurre
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/26/07, Iakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> James.Strachan wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2/26/07, Iakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> hi,
>> >>
>> >> i am running a client which concurrently uses two connections both are
>> >> named
>> >> (thru createConnection metho
On 2/27/07, spiderman2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've read the
http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html doc but the
diagram mentions a database. I thought we're only talking about writing to a
file system?? Just a typo?
We just reused the same images for both database
I've read the
http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html doc but the
diagram mentions a database. I thought we're only talking about writing to a
file system?? Just a typo?
I see that the configuration mentioned in the doc is pointing to a file
system:
but is called a "jo
I managed to partially get a network of brokers working. This is what I
learnt in the process.
1. All brokers in the network should use a different name.
2. "Transport Connector" is what clients and peer brokers communicate
with a broker using. So if you have a transport connector like
Hi All,
I am trying to configure set of brokers running distributed over the WAN.
There are 3 machines devdist01 (Distribution server), devslave01 (slave
server), devpres01 (presentation server).
The communication between brokers are devslave01 -> devdist01 <-> devpres01.
Basically devslave01 p
On 2/27/07, Gaurav Hariani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a simple way to handle this at the client currently?
No, not yet.
Maybe something like a listener on the Session/Connection that gets
notified in case of a transport failure?
I'm adding that :)
Also required is a way to store t
Is there a way for a client to determine which broker it is connected to
(when using a failover URI)?
Is there a simple way to handle this at the client currently?
Maybe something like a listener on the Session/Connection that gets
notified in case of a transport failure?
Also is there any means of querying a broker for load information (e.g.
how many clients are connected to a broker)
to allow
On 2/27/07, TonyLeigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi James,
Thanks for the info, I understand what is happening now and can work around
it in my application.
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> So the reason for this is that currently there is a single thread per
> connection processing server side oper
Ooops,
failover:tcp... in ra.xml solved my problem.
Thanks
Luciano
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/23/07, Luciano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> An MDB using ActiveMQ 4.1.0 JCA connector in JBoss, stop consuming
>> message
>> from a queue on a remote ActiveMQ 4.1.0 broker after a broker res
Hi James,
Thanks for the info, I understand what is happening now and can work around
it in my application.
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> So the reason for this is that currently there is a single thread per
> connection processing server side operations. Normally these
> operations are pretty f
Hi James
attached you will find the execution log and the traces taken after the ^C
As you see from the thread dump, some threads are busy doing some
work (within an onMessage) but the operations they perform are guarded by
a timeout that should be well expired at the moment I kill the process.
Sorry about the delay, I have been out of the office for a couple of days,
and yes, it was the remote jar that was missing, thankyou very much,
Osian
David Borja-2 wrote:
>
> Specifically this jar ...
>
> mx4j-remote.jar
>
>
> On 2/23/07, David Borja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi ...
On 2/27/07, drvillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi James
I'm fine with the traces, but the problem is that they
don't stop...there's something AMQ is still busy doing,
and I can't figure out how to stop it. the
Active Sessions = X
actually decreases with time, but when that reaches 1 it
stays li
Hi James
I'm fine with the traces, but the problem is that they
don't stop...there's something AMQ is still busy doing,
and I can't figure out how to stop it. the
Active Sessions = X
actually decreases with time, but when that reaches 1 it
stays like that forever (forever is ~minutes )
I'm usin
On 1/30/07, drvillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
after more than a month I haven't been able to solve this...
I'm currently destroying jencks' JCAConnectors and JCAContainer,
which also stop ActiveMQResourceAdapter as a side effect.
Then I stop the broker via stop(), followed by the
application
On 2/23/07, Luciano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An MDB using ActiveMQ 4.1.0 JCA connector in JBoss, stop consuming message
from a queue on a remote ActiveMQ 4.1.0 broker after a broker restart. A
Spring application inside the same JBoss instance can instead continue to
send messages to the same q
So the reason for this is that currently there is a single thread per
connection processing server side operations. Normally these
operations are pretty fast; but if a producer is blocked, currently we
block the producer thread (to stopt it potentially sending more
messages and causing more troubl
On 2/26/07, Iakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/26/07, Iakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> i am running a client which concurrently uses two connections both are
>> named
>> (thru createConnection method) both are working, but i only see one of
>> them
>>
On 2/26/07, sparky2708 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do I achieve failover for C# NMS Clients?
We've not yet implemented Failover for NMS; I've started work on it
but it'll be a little while until its completed.
--
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
On 2/27/07, LiXiao2007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to write a program with multiple threads. Each thread will
subscribe same mesage queue. There are two ways to do that.
1. Each thread has its own connection and session to the queue.
2. All the threads share same connection and each
On 2/27/07, LiXiao2007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to send messages to a central point where JMS will automatically
forward them to a set of queues for different systems. It seems to me that
both Virutal topic and composite queue can accomplish this. Between virtual
topic and composi
Hi
this task is starting to get at the top of the pile...
We're almost ready to ship and still, if ctrl-c the process
(which runs the embedded broker) I don't manage
to have it exiting. After having destroyed the consumers,
the pools and the spring container itself it stays showing
Active Sessi
27 matches
Mail list logo