Hi (again),
Since my problem was posted last week I didn't manage to get the zeroconf
discovery agent working.
Is it suppose to work "out of the box" or do I have to include a specific
jar file in my classpath?
Any explanation or example will greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Francois
Fct wrote
I would like to write a program with multiple threads. Each thread will
subscribe same mesage queue. There are two ways to do that.
1. Each thread has its own connection and session to the queue.
2. All the threads share same connection and each thread has its own
session.
I don't know which way
I would like to send messages to a central point where JMS will automatically
forward them to a set of queues for different systems. It seems to me that
both Virutal topic and composite queue can accomplish this. Between virtual
topic and composite queue, which one will do the better job. What is
which version of activemq are using, iam using 4.1 and i could failover also
send me ur config.
naga007 wrote:
>
>
> use failover:(tcp://host1:61616,tcp://host2:61616) uri format for the
> client.s
>
>
> Gaurav Hariani wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to setup a cluster of Brokers (standalone) which
I still get the same exception on the clients.
naga007 wrote:
>
>
> use failover:(tcp://host1:61616,tcp://host2:61616) uri format for the
> client.s
>
>
> Gaurav Hariani wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to setup a cluster of Brokers (standalone) which clients can
>> connect to (ideally I would lik
How do I achieve failover for C# NMS Clients?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FAILOVER-with-C--NMS-Client-tf3295828s2354.html#a9168460
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/26/07, Iakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> i am running a client which concurrently uses two connections both are
>> named
>> (thru createConnection method) both are working, but i only see one of
>> them
>> as named in JConsole. how come?
>
> Are you
On 2/26/07, Iakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi,
i am running a client which concurrently uses two connections both are named
(thru createConnection method) both are working, but i only see one of them
as named in JConsole. how come?
Are you sure you are refreshing the tree in JConsole? Does
Hello All,
I've been struggling with a problem of ActiveMQ locking up with a
combination of fast producers and slow consumers. After trawling through
the threads I think I understand what is happening and why the lockup
occurs, but I can only solve the lockup with two connections when it seems
t
hi,
i am running a client which concurrently uses two connections both are named
(thru createConnection method) both are working, but i only see one of them
as named in JConsole. how come?
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/cant-see-named-connection-in-jconsole-t
Thanks for the link with regards to keepAlive and the configuration of
soTimeout. Will experiment with these settings in 4.1 for now. Am a bit
hesitant to deploy 4.2 on our system as it is not considered a stable
release as of yet. Though, I will checkout your 4.2 and validate that this
issue n
Hi all
using rev. 510896
sometimes when recovering I get negative values...
this isn't happening on the latest 4.1 revision.
cheers
Francesco
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Negative-queue-size-with-trunk-tf3293548s2354.html#a9161076
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing
use failover:(tcp://host1:61616,tcp://host2:61616) uri format for the
client.s
Gaurav Hariani wrote:
>
> I'm trying to setup a cluster of Brokers (standalone) which clients can
> connect to (ideally I would like them to be discovered)
> listening to a TOPIC. In the case of a broker failing, th
I'm trying to setup a cluster of Brokers (standalone) which clients can
connect to (ideally I would like them to be discovered)
listening to a TOPIC. In the case of a broker failing, the clients connected
to that broker should reconnect to another broker.
I'm able to get clients to connect to a r
That sounds fine. The web console and web demos's usually have a
broker embedded inside them that you can talk to via TCP so there's no
absolute reason to disable vm:// transport in the web demo/console and
explicitly use TCP.
On 2/26/07, pandi79 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Finally my Jms progra
Finally my Jms program is able to receve messages from the queue.. I'ave
updated the web.xml
lThe paragraph ine in web.xml
vm://localhost
is replaced by
tcp://localhost:61616
1. started web demo example by the coomand mvn jetty6:run
2. started the activemq broker by the command 'activemq'
On 2/24/07, Chris T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all
To successfully run the ruby examples
(apache-activemq-4.1.0-incubator/example/ruby/*) multiple times, you have -
at least - to append the following line to publisher.rb
@conn.disconnect
Thanks for that! I've patched the examples
FW
Thanks for your response.
Once I sent the message through html page (webdemo example), I tried the
link http://localhost:8080/activemq-web-demo/queueBrowse/myqueue?view=xml to
browse all the messages. I am able to see (it is browse option) all the
messaages which I posted.
Then I ran my jms pro
On 2/26/07, pandi79 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Using ActiveMQ 4.0.2 Web demo sample. Able to send & browse the message via
internet explorer as per the instruction provided by Apache.
But my requirement to receive the message by using JMS stand alone program..
The following steps I have done.
BTW more background in this thread
http://www.nabble.com/JMSPriority-...-tf1754744s2354.html#a4771222
On 2/26/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Using selectors is usually a better way of shaping traffic than JMSPriority.
On 2/25/07, Stefan Arentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm co
The activemq.xml is used to configure ActiveMQ - you use the web.xml
to configure
On 2/24/07, pandi79 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I am using ActiveMQ 4.1.0 . I set the jar file
activemq-web-4.1.0-incubator.jar in the class path and tried to start the
broker. I guess the br
Using selectors is usually a better way of shaping traffic than JMSPriority.
On 2/25/07, Stefan Arentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm confused about JMSPriority. My use case is simple:
I have a bunch of fast servers that need to process slow (1 - 5
second) jobs. I also have many slow servers fo
22 matches
Mail list logo