Re: option wireFormat.tcpNoDelayEnabled=true seems to be ignored

Again I have to reply myself to provide more information... It seems from my tests that even the socket.tcpNoDelay=true flag has an effect on broker configuration (in activemq.xml file). It only seems to work in client connection URIs. The other 2 possibilities (tcpNoDelay=true and wireFormat.tcp

Re: Memory usage increase after client power failure

Op woensdag 21 februari 2007 21:05, schreef eccrowe: > It should also be noted that after a client power off, the remaining active > clients very quickly stop receiving their messages. Server logs still > appear to be sending messages but the enqueue count is not increasing in > the jmx-console a

Re: building activemq cpp latest repository code on linux

Hi We tried building activemq-cpp latest source code on linux Linux 2.4.21-37.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Sep 7 13:28:55 EDT 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux Here is the error that we got for it checking for Cppunit - version >= 1.10.2... 1.10.2 checking for pthread_create in -lpthread... no confi

Expired Message Listener

We recently migrated our application from ActiveMQ3.2.1 to ActiveMQ 4.1.0. We were using a listener for Expired messages (after timetolive) when we used ActiveMQ 3.2.1 using DeadLetterPolicy class. When we switched to ActiveMQ 4.1, we noticed that the DeadLetterPolicy class has been changed in 4

Re: Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

GaryG wrote: > AMQ Broker is down again. Same situation. However, running "jstack" on the > PID doesn't work, it hangs connecting to the process. > > So, I opened up the JMX console, and am providing you some of stats that > looked interesting. > > My main questions regarding this output are: >

Re: Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

AMQ Broker is down again. Same situation. However, running "jstack" on the PID doesn't work, it hangs connecting to the process. So, I opened up the JMX console, and am providing you some of stats that looked interesting. My main questions regarding this output are: 1) Why does Broker memory

Can Filters be used for virtual topic

I would like to know if the filters can be used for virtual topic so only needed messages are delivered to the physical queues that are tied to the virtual topic. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Can-Filters-be-used-for-virtual-topic-tf3269702s2354.html#a9090514 Sen

Re: ActiveMQ consultants

On 2/21/07, GaryG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was wondering if anyone knows of consultants (consulting companies) that might specialize in ActiveMQ services. I'd like to have the info handy if we ever need to bring someone in to help us solve issues and tune. LogicBlaze provides services an

Messages Stuck in Queue after Failover

I am testing failover scenarios with ActiveMq 4.1 and with Shared File System Master Slave. The failover seems to work fine - but I notice that some messages remain "stuck" in the queue after the failover and don't get consumed. If I restart the consumer application after the failover happens then

ActiveMQ consultants

I was wondering if anyone knows of consultants (consulting companies) that might specialize in ActiveMQ services. I'd like to have the info handy if we ever need to bring someone in to help us solve issues and tune. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-consu

Re: Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

Chris, in this specific case we're using Topics, not Queues, but I've seen the same issue happen for Queues. Next time it "hangs" I'll get a stack dump and post it. Should be sometime this evening (I've not seen it run reliably for more then 8 hours) Thank you. _Gary Christopher G. Stach II

Re: Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

GaryG wrote: > I've got the JMX running. Again the architecture ran fine for about 3 hours, > then all my topics seemed to stop receiving messages. > > So, here's the situation: > > 1) the producers ARE sending messages and there are no exception from AMQ > API when they're sent. > 2) AMQ Brok

Re: Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

I've got the JMX running. Again the architecture ran fine for about 3 hours, then all my topics seemed to stop receiving messages. So, here's the situation: 1) the producers ARE sending messages and there are no exception from AMQ API when they're sent. 2) AMQ Broker is up, and amq logs indic

Re: Memory usage increase after client power failure

Have deployed 4.1.0 and it appears that things have at least initially not improved. I am no longer seeing any increase in memory but I am also now not seeing any consumer removal when the client has been powered off. This is apparent when examining the jmx console and the activemq server DEBUG

ActiveMQ and Glassfish

Hi, Does anyone know if https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-765 is fixed? I've looked at the source code and I can't see any references to transient variables now...perhaps it is fixed? -=david=- -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-and-Glassfish-tf3267635s

Re: Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

I have not looked at the JMX stats. For whatever reason, I haven't been able to connect remotely to the broker. Aside from that...Why would a broker kill clients due to inactivity? Can this be configured/turned off? In our case, the producers of messages to this topic are sending messages ever