Ah - ok that's useful - I'll see if I can reproduce
cheers,
Rob
On 17 Feb 2007, at 18:48, Tom wrote:
Op zaterdag 17 februari 2007 19:07, schreef Rob Davies:
thank you!!
Rob,
I figured out that the SlowReceive1 junit test probably deadlocks
because the connection is shared between sender
Op zaterdag 17 februari 2007 19:07, schreef Rob Davies:
> thank you!!
>
Rob,
I figured out that the SlowReceive1 junit test probably deadlocks
because the connection is shared between sender and consumer.
So I rewrote the test and now the test runs to completion.
Halfway during the send the Pr
thank you!!
On 17 Feb 2007, at 17:33, tvijlbrief wrote:
I created a junit test which hangs after about 50 iterations.
Note that the behaviour is not compatible with two standalone
programs and a
tcp-broker.
In that case the producer can still send but the consumer blocks...
The unit test
I created a junit test which hangs after about 50 iterations.
Note that the behaviour is not compatible with two standalone programs and a
tcp-broker.
In that case the producer can still send but the consumer blocks...
The unit test is attached to:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ
thanks! - I'd forgot why I'd put that option in ;)
On 17 Feb 2007, at 15:02, naga007 wrote:
As per my understanding, if we need evenly balanced queues we
should set
conduitSubscriptions=false and also it is more appropriate to set this
incase of topics. Iam not sure if iam correct, but wo
As per my understanding, if we need evenly balanced queues we should set
conduitSubscriptions=false and also it is more appropriate to set this
incase of topics. Iam not sure if iam correct, but would appreciate any
feedback on this.
rajdavies wrote:
>
> why is conduitSubscriptions false ?
Thanks for the input, James.
I'm using Postgresql so I don't think there is a DB vendor solution.
Are you suggesting to create different topics for each datacenter or share
the same topic across all the datacenters?
One of the issues I'm having is exactly where the brokers will be at each
datac
