Hello ActiveMQ devs,
I don't want to seem picky :( but 1 week has passed and still no feedback on
this TCP_NODELAY issue.
Finding that "wireFormat.tcpNoDelayEnabled" does not work but
"socket.tcpNoDelay" DOES work even if it is not documented, already helped 1
person... see the last comment of H
Hello All,
Is this the forum to ask How-To questons with regards to deploying
ActiveMQ in a given topology? I'm new to ActiveMQ and could use a bit of
advice. If this kind of question should be posted elsewhere, my apologies,
please point me there.
My topology
--
In a nutshell, I h
Good catch Lorne!
Added a patch for this issue on the svn trunk r507792.
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1163
Regards,
Jonas
Lorne Wilson wrote:
Folks,
I've been trying to use the tempDestinationAuthorizationEntry feature in 4.2
and I think I've found a problem. If I set up a
Thanks James.
In this particular case, the first problem I was trying to solve was
simply allowing a Lingo client to relax/control the TLS/SSL
certificate acceptance criteria.
Using the ssl:// transport, the SslTransportFactory that ships with
ActiveMQ simply returns the default SSLContext w
Folks,
I've been trying to use the tempDestinationAuthorizationEntry feature in 4.2
and I think I've found a problem. If I set up a consumer of the temp queue
and add it to the read permission, it always reports that I don't have
permission to read the queue. However, if I add that consumer to th
Hello Active MQ Users ,
I am getting the following exceptions , when active MQ
channel is not used for a period of time.As a result of it , the socket
for connection is getting closed.
Feb 14, 2007 10:37:28 AM org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnection
onAsyncException
WARNING: Async
Hi James ...
The version of active mq is the latest (apache-activemq-4.1.0-incubator),
and the activemq log seems normal (i think so ...):
2007-02-14 09:09:16,306 [main ] INFO
BrokerService - ActiveMQ 4.1.0-incubator JMS Message Broker
(localhost) is starting
2007-02-
There has been discussion regarding FileMessage or something similar: a
message for transferring large amounts of data.
For background, see:
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1075
We need something that offers better service than streaming, of course
by building on top of it. That
On 2/14/07, yolcuabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thx for help. another question... what means actually queuePrefetch of 0?
Its the slowest possible way of consuming messages; basically no
message is sent to a client until it pulls it from the broker via a
consumer.receive() call.
http://activ
i have checked the status of subscribers. all consumers have active state!
what is downside of queuePrefetch of 0?
yolcuabbas
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/14/07, yolcuabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> yes. with prefetch of 1 the first message stays always on queue after
>> startup! bloc
thx for help. another question... what means actually queuePrefetch of 0?
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/14/07, yolcuabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> yes. with prefetch of 1 the first message stays always on queue after
>> startup! blocked consumer? how can i see blocked consumers with J
On 2/14/07, yolcuabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yes. with prefetch of 1 the first message stays always on queue after
startup! blocked consumer? how can i see blocked consumers with JMX?
Use JConsole to look at the active subscribers & their status. Try
killing them to release the block.
htt
yes. with prefetch of 1 the first message stays always on queue after
startup! blocked consumer? how can i see blocked consumers with JMX?
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/14/07, yolcuabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i have observed strange behaviour. I use activemq4.1 with mule1
On 2/14/07, yolcuabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
i have observed strange behaviour. I use activemq4.1 with mule1.3.3. the
first message stays always on queue!!! if i change the value of
queuePrefetch to zero then it will be consumed. is it expected behaviour?
No. Is this with a prefetch
Hi,
i have observed strange behaviour. I use activemq4.1 with mule1.3.3. the
first message stays always on queue!!! if i change the value of
queuePrefetch to zero then it will be consumed. is it expected behaviour?
thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/queu
On 2/13/07, Sandeep Chayapathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I was testing the Java interface to ActiveMQ. Im interested in the
static transport mechanism, specifically, I have a master/slave setup and I
want my code to connect to the master always and on failure, switch to using
On 2/14/07, J. Matthew Pryor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are using SSL to allow clients and servers to connect together
with Lingo doing the actual RPC mechanism on top of ActiveMQ (no
persistent store).
I have read http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-use-ssl.html and this
is fine is all the c
Which version are you using? Also what appears in the broker's log
file - it seems the broker side is not responding properly
On 2/14/07, David Borja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi activemq devs!!
I'm having a problem with activemq and log4j ...
this is my log4j.properties :
log4j.appender.A1=
The hang could just mean that the broker is down/hung/busy? Its
basically just waiting for the broker to respond. Do you see anything
in the broker log?
On 2/13/07, Jack Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When creating a new connection, I am sometimes seeing a hang in
setClientID when it tries
19 matches
Mail list logo
