Greetings,
I apologize in advance if this question has already been asked before, but
my forum search has not been fruitful in regards to this question as of yet.
The question I have is about the memory usage requirements with a
non-persistent topic. We are running ActiveMQ 4.0-RC2 in an embedd
Hi,
I'm a New user. I'd like to use activemq for a Network Of Brokers /
Clustered deployment. The catch is that I can't afford to loose a single
message in the event of failure.
In the Network of Brokers topology, I'm reading this isn't possible:
"At any point in time the message will only exis
If I try to deploy the ActiveMQ JCA resource adapter
(activemq-rar-4.1.0-incubator.rar) side by side with a Spring 2 war in JBoss
4.0.3 , I get the following error on server startup:
ERROR
[org.springframework.web.context.ContextLoader] Context initialization
failed
org.springframework.beans.fact
On 7 Feb 2007, at 19:38, Suchitha Koneru ((sukoneru)) wrote:
Hello Active Mq Users ,
I am using Publish/subscribe model for
transfer of
messages with durable subscriptions. I suppose that active mq
internally stores messages using queue or a similar data structure.
yes
I still can't get this working. Setting the sequence id to 0 doesn't do
anything. In fact, when i sent N number of messages to a variety of message
groups, and print out the ==msg.getStringProperty("JMSXGroupSeq")==
what prints is always 0. Is there a configuration option i don't know about
to
Hello Active Mq Users ,
I am using Publish/subscribe model for transfer of
messages with durable subscriptions. I suppose that active mq
internally stores messages using queue or a similar data structure.
I was just wondering about the size of this queue maintained internal
I will, thanks.
Carlos
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> Ah good catch. We need to fix that.
>
> I've raised the following JIRA...
> http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1157
>
> I've checked in a patch which should work to trunk if you fancy giving it
> a try.
>
> On 2/7/07, Carlos <[EMAIL
I've tried it but it doesn't help.
Bobby Quninne wrote:
>
> I had a similar issue under linux. I just started activemq as root and it
> was resolved.
>
> eylon wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've tried to configure 2 brokers, having one of them listen to a
>> multicast address and the other adver
Ah good catch. We need to fix that.
I've raised the following JIRA...
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1157
I've checked in a patch which should work to trunk if you fancy giving it a try.
On 2/7/07, Carlos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cannot create destinations at startup when they
Hi James,
I tried the same test with the latest 4.2 snapshot but I'm getting the same
behaviour.
I wrote a short program that demonstrates the problem. It's called
http://www.nabble.com/file/6298/Test.java Test.java . Notice that if the
ENABLE_JMX boolean in BrokerDisconnect is set to true, the
Cannot create destinations at startup when they have authorization
requirements
Hi. I have a queue that is configured in a
element so only some roles can read,write or admin it. I want to create this
queue at
startup, using . When I try, activemq fails to start
with a SecurityException
I would
Dear all,
I am currently struggling in migrating my Spring 1.2 based Application
(based on ActiveMQ 4.0) to Spring 2.0 and ActiveMQ 4.1. The examples
provided in the Spring support part do not cover a fully functional setup,
the links to the subversion repository are broken.
Can anyone provide
I had a similar issue under linux. I just started activemq as root and it was
resolved.
eylon wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've tried to configure 2 brokers, having one of them listen to a
> multicast address and the other advertise itself using discovery. This
> configuration is described
> http://
On 2/6/07, Suchitha Koneru (sukoneru) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you so much James.
Which version of active mq support durable subscriptions,
All of them since 1.0
As of now, I am using the following jars , in regard to active mq
activemq-core-4.0.1.jar
backport-util-concurrent-2.1.ja
At least in connection URL's used by clients, the option
wireFormat.tcpNoDelayEnabled=true is ignored silently.
So, you may have tried to disable Nagle's algorithm, to reduce latency for
example, without noticing any effect...
workaround: use socket.tcpNoDelay instead, for example:
"tcp://localho
Well, finally I found the cause for this problem.
It was not an OS issue, it was that ActiveMQ does not recognize the option
"wireFormat.tcpNoDelayEnabled" properly, and silently ignores it or so it
seems.
I have opened an issue at https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1156
, see there for
16 matches
Mail list logo