Thank you so much James.
Which version of active mq support durable subscriptions,
As of now, I am using the following jars , in regard to active mq
activemq-core-4.0.1.jar
backport-util-concurrent-2.1.jar
geronimo-j2ee-management_1.0_spec-1.0.jar
geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar
incubator-activemq-
On 2/5/07, robparrott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HI James,
Can you describe in "lite" detail what would be needed to perform this
refactoring? What classes, etc.?
I took a look at my crappy code and was so embarrassed I've done most
of the refactoring for you :). Its now very nearly working f
If you are using JDBC persistence this property should be under "DataSource"
definition in activemq.xml
ptomsic wrote:
>
> hmm, on what bean in the xbeans file?
> i've only got the following set up:
>
>
>
>
>
> where would i apply your suggestion?
>
>
> Nilantha wrote:
>>
>> Probab
hmm, on what bean in the xbeans file?
i've only got the following set up:
where would i apply your suggestion?
Nilantha wrote:
>
> Probably this would help...
>
> Try setting
> if you have set
> as "true" in your data source configuration.
>
> see
> http://www.nabble.com/DB-connectio
On 2/6/07, cafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so, you recommend to use for JmsTemplate a PooledConnectionFactory and for
DefaultMessageListenerContainer a simple ActiveMQConnectionFactory?
do you agreed?
Yes.
--
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
so, you recommend to use for JmsTemplate a PooledConnectionFactory and for
DefaultMessageListenerContainer a simple ActiveMQConnectionFactory?
do you agreed?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problems-reconnecting-when-the-broker-break-down-tf3182279.html#a8832235
Sent fro
On 2/6/07, cafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thx James I forget the failover word.
"FWIW there's generally no point using a PooledConnectionFactory when
using Springs DefaultMessageListenerContainer. The
PooledConnectionFactory is really mostly for using Spring's
JmsTemplate (i.e. for sending). F
thx James I forget the failover word.
"FWIW there's generally no point using a PooledConnectionFactory when
using Springs DefaultMessageListenerContainer. The
PooledConnectionFactory is really mostly for using Spring's
JmsTemplate (i.e. for sending). For consuming it does not do any
pooling."
I'
James.Strachan wrote:
>
>> Does this mean that MessageGroups only work when there's only one broker,
>> and don't work in Master-Slave broker configuration??
>
> They work with a single broker or with Master-Slave. But they don't
> work with networks of brokers.
>
>
Then what am I doing wro
On 2/6/07, cafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my app I'm using activeMQ4.1.0 and spring 2.0. and I have configured a
DefaultMessageListenerContainer and a PooledConnectionFactory.
FWIW there's generally no point using a PooledConnectionFactory when
using Springs DefaultMessageListenerContainer
In my app I’m using activeMQ4.1.0 and spring 2.0. and I have configured a
DefaultMessageListenerContainer and a PooledConnectionFactory.
And doing some test if I restart my broker the app is not capable of
reconnect and I get the following exception:
org.springframework.jms.listener.DefaultMes
ActiveMQ is a TLP now.
Just remove the word incubator from the SVN path on the website and you
should be all set.
I'll update the page in a bit.
> -Original Message-
> From: masterov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 11:06 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
>
masterov wrote:
>
> connectionFactory->setUseAsyncSend(true);
>
FYI, this was fixed per Timothy Bish:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-63
Thanks Timothy!
I can't test it however, since I can't check out the trunk, the links on
this page don't work:
http://activemq.apache.org/
On 2/6/07, miniman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Transport listner sounds good, do you have an example of this ?
Am afraid not but its a pretty trivial listener to implement.
--
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Transport listner sounds good, do you have an example of this ?
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> What do you want to do if the broker is down? Let the user know about
> it and keep waiting until a connection is established?
>
> The simplest solution today is to use auto-reconnect...
> http://activem
Incidentally in another thread someone spotted a bug that was
affecting the setting of custom consumer configurations in the RA, so
the latest 4.2-SNAPSHOT could help your issue
On 2/5/07, magic.moose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I just wanted to show config w/o prefetch stuff.
Anyway, setti
On 2/5/07, mers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm stopping a broker's TransportConnector with the connector's stop()
method. If JMX is disabled, stopping the connector correctly fires an active
connection's ExceptionListener. If JMS is enabled, the Listener doesn't get
fired.
Is this expected behav
What do you want to do if the broker is down? Let the user know about
it and keep waiting until a connection is established?
The simplest solution today is to use auto-reconnect...
http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-support-auto-reconnection.html
then the createConnection() method will block u
All if i have a client which i want to catch an exception is the client is
unable to connect. So if the activemq is down i still want the client to
work but just display a message that the host is down.
When i try
// Create a Connection
Connection connection = connectionFactory.c
On 2/6/07, GaryG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I started playing around with Message Groups and have a bunch of new
questions:
1. If I'm understanding this correctly, Message Groups are tying groupIDs
to a specific consumer of the Queue. However, this mapping is private to
the broker. So, the p
On 2/5/07, GaryG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GaryG wrote:
>
>
> On 2/5/07, Givental, Gary wrote:
>> Ah yes, I should have clarified that :)
>>
>> The nature of the applications makes that impossible. We need to
>> ensure that A) all the tasks are processed in sequential order, B)
>> each work ta
On 2/6/07, Suchitha Koneru (sukoneru) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the information. As per the JMS documentation , Sessions with
durable subscriptions, should specify a Client Identifier
I am using Java 1.5 and Tomcat 5.5.20 .
Where should I specify the client identifier ?
The code tha
On 2/6/07, jkurtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The reason that the dispatch needs to be paused on the Server side is for a
Quality of Service Broker to control the message dispatch if the network
traffic gets to be too much. This is similar to the client Pre-Fetch Limit,
except the messages are m
Good catch! - committed to trunk SVN revision 504023
On 6 Feb 2007, at 02:33, elliottjf wrote:
can somebody confirm if this is really a bug? if it is, it looks
like a
pretty serious one.
elliottjf wrote:
Okay, from what I can tell, when using the ra activation spec driven
consumer con
24 matches
Mail list logo
