Total Noob.
This is my first attempt at getting into UML. Not good so far.
I downloaded 2.6.17 32-bit x86 kernel from nagafix (http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/)
and it bombs on startup.
Host is FC4 at 2.6.17 (32bit x86) SMP on hyperthreaded P4.
Running in strace I see the following. The important bit se
--- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What was the boot output?
Verbatim terminal output
$ ./kernel32-2.6.17.7 mem=64M
Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK
Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
Checking advanced syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
Checking
--- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 05:45:33PM +0200, Jax wrote:
> > > $ ARCH=um make linux
> > >
> > make linux ARCH=um
>
> These should be the same. In one case, it's in the environment and in the
> other, it's on the command line, but it's all the same to th
I'm looking for advice on building up a filesystem image file.
I have a working server that I want to mimick in UML. What is the best way to
get the filesystem of the real server into a UML filesystem image? What are the
gotchas? eg. I can immediately suspect device configs and partition tables
w
--- Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 06 August 2006 12:41, Richard Andrews wrote:
> > --- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What was the boot output?
> >
> > Verbatim terminal output
> >
> > $ ./kernel32-2.6.17.7 m
--- Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To work on:
>
> /etc/fstab
> /etc/inittab maybe
Yup x 2.
> Device configs:
> things like hwclock, consolefonts and X11 don't make sense in UML (however
> you
> can run Xnest instead of normal X by changing a symlink somewhere). In some
> distros (
--- Haywood Floyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On host i write: xhost +192.169.0.250 ,the uml ip.
> On uml: i write export DISPLAY=192.169.0.250:0.0 , the host tap1 ip.
> On uml i installed firefox, xterm, icewm and xdmcp.
>
> On host tcp 6000 x11 port is open. so is udp 177 xdmcp port.
>
> Ever
--- Flavio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to communicate you my new website: http://www.vdd-project.org .
> It contains my degree thesis work and the project involves two
> existing technologies: UML and LTSP.
Interesting ideas with good potential for showcasing Linux. However it strik
--- Christopher Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The simplest way to do that (have a host act like a router between guests)
> would be to use ethertap devices. Each guest would talk to to the host
> through a different tap device and the guests would each use eth0 on their
> side.
What a
Which uml guest kernels should be used with which filesystem images (does it
matter)?
I'm asking because I assume that more recent distros will make use of kernel
features which are not present in older kernels.
The nagafix page seems to promote a mix-and-match approach which doesn't sound
like i
--- Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recent distros (except slackware) may not work with 2.4 (udev/devfs/etc)
> but apart from that any recent 2.6 kernel should do (bearing in mind
> that few bugfixes are backported (except for 2.6.16).
I was thinking more in terms of features added
--- Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> >> But it would also be nice to have an indication one
> >> way or the other in a prominent place.
> >
> > Well, stating clearly such a thing is a very good idea - can you do it,
> > Antoine?
> >
> Getting a few people to r
--- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you give someone a dead easy entry point like this it encourages
> adoption.
>
> I think this can be done by embedding the filesystem as an initramfs
> in the UML kernel image. Then, running it might be a matter of
> wget the-image.bz2
>
--- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 09:09:55PM +0200, Fermín Galán Márquez wrote:
> > the virtual machine boots right, but if I issue a simple 'iptables -L'
> > it hangs. Additionally, a top command in the host enviroment shows the
> > linux process associated to
--- Fermín Galán Márquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the bug report (ok, only the conclusions: the technical details are
> too much to me at this moment :), I understand that (in that case) the
> problem is solved by the
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=186411 patch (kernel)
15 matches
Mail list logo
