[uml-user] uml console problem -> solution

Hi, these are my first attempts with uml. i've a Debian 3.0 (woody) box with kernel-image-2.4.18 and tried to do all from scratch (kernel 2.4.25 with skas patch for host, uml kernel 2.4.25, uml kernel 2.8.1, uml kernel 2.6.11, uml kernel 2.6.11.11, root_fs with debootstrap woody, root_fs with d

[uml-user] network bridge between host and uml

Hi, my problem was, that i don't want to make a routed network between host and uml. i want to that the uml is on the same network as the host (i'm trying to migrate a few real old hosts to uml-instances). i know that this solution is not as secure as a separate routed network. but for my purpo

[uml-user] uml differences on the same root_fs (ssh, nslookup, pam, ..)

Hi, i've a problem in my uml: booted with kernel linux-2.4.19-5 (http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/dl-sf.html) ssh connects to the uml work. nslookup work. (the working uml) booted with my own compiled linux-2.6.11.11 ssh connects to the uml doesn't work (Connection closed by IP), nslookup

Re: [uml-user] SSH problem

Hi, Am Mittwoch, 1. Juni 2005 00:50 schrieb Jeff Dike: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 10:33:09PM +0200, Jean-Michel Caricand wrote: > > I rename /lib/tls to /lib/tls.disabled and reboot my computer but ssh > > connection is not possible. Strange ! > I bet it's a mismatch between the pty devices availa

Re: [uml-user] SSH problem

Am Donnerstag, 2. Juni 2005 07:48 schrieb Jean-Michel Caricand: > Jeff Dike a écrit : > >On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 12:23:27AM +0200, Jean-Michel Caricand wrote: > >>[pid 1537] --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) --- > >Looks like tls, move /lib/tls out of the way. > That work! I am surprised b

Re: [uml-user] Problem: no more processes left in this runlevel

Hi, Am Donnerstag, 2. Juni 2005 06:05 schrieb Dinesh Ahuja: > I am working on Red Hat linux 8.0 and installed an > build the UML kernel, but facing below problem while > booting up UML Kernel. > INIT: Id "c1" respawning too > fast: disabled for 5 minutes > INIT: Id "c2" respawning too fast: disabl

Re: [uml-user] running uml on external ip

Hello, Am Donnerstag, 23. Juni 2005 13:52 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Hello, I have a host that has one internal, and one external nic, with two > available external ips. > I'd like to run the uml machine on the second external ip, with eth0 > inside the uml has one of the available external ip

[uml-user] several uml, bridge, tuntap, several tapX, eth

Hi, i've now spend half a day to find out that the default MAC-address set by uml is FE:FD:00:00:00:00. That was the reason for my bad network connectivity to several umls on one host bridged the local network to the umls over tuntap. So if someone has ping problems to his two or more umls, try

[uml-user] performance of block devices resp. filesystems

Hi, can anybody tell me which is the best performing fs for a running uml? How much of the performce of the disks can i get through to the uml? I tried ubd files on a ext3 filesystem on the host. But the performance was very bad. Then i tried nfs and it performs better and it has the advantages

Re: [uml-user] performance of block devices resp. filesystems

Hi, Am Samstag, 20. August 2005 06:55 schrieb Jason Clark: > I run on real block devices (in my case, linux software RAID 1 devices) > for each of my umls. Im currently running 4 UMLS on a box, each with their > own RAID 1 md device. Works out pretty well, the performance is good and > the host s

Re: [uml-user] performance of block devices resp. filesystems

Hi, Am Samstag, 20. August 2005 15:16 schrieb Markus Hochholdinger: > Uhm, i now have to test this with async ubd devices because i had the sync > option for ubd on. ok, async ubd gets 18-20MB/s. So ubd to a partition is twice faster! Can anybody tell me if async ubd to a partition is sa

Re: [uml-user] several uml, bridge, tuntap, several tapX, eth

ts of power and space inside a server rack). -- Gruß \|/ eMHa (o o) ------oOO--U--OOo-- Markus Hochholdinger e-mail mailto:[EMAIL PRO

Re: [uml-user] several uml, bridge, tuntap, several tapX, eth

Hi, Am Montag, 22. August 2005 19:22 schrieb Blaisorblade: > That's VERY interesting. But UML's trick to variate the MAC was never > tested in that case. Is that the one enabled by CONFIG_IP_PNP (i.e. "IP: > kernel level autoconfiguration")? yes. > It seems yes, and that code seem to have the s

Re: [uml-user] uml for 2.6.12 kernel

Hi, Am Dienstag, 23. August 2005 23:55 schrieb ashwin tanugula: > I want to build UML from source using a 2.6.12 kernel. Can somebody > tell me whether to patch it or not as kernels from 2.6.9 have the UML > included?? you don't need to patch the (guest) kernel when using 2.6.12. Just do a bash$

[uml-user] best 2.4.x uml kernel?

Hi, i'm migrating some old machines with a older linux to uml. I tried to make kernel 2.6.x run, but not all things worked out of the box. Especially loading of modules will fail if modutils are to old. So the easiest thing for me is to take an older 2.4.x kernel. And here is my question: Whic

Re: [uml-user] Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel.

Hi, Am Sonntag, 28. August 2005 18:54 schrieb Clifford Ton: > Warning: unable to open an initial console. is /dev set up correctly? Is there a /dev/console and /dev/tty0? In the rootfs /dev directory do "./MAKEDEV console" and try it again. -- greetings eMHa pgpExnnt83vJu.pgp Description:

Re: [uml-user] Debian packages and user-mode Linux

Hi, Am Montag, 7. November 2005 17:58 schrieb Guy Heatley: > Hello, > I have: > 1) A debian host kernel with the SKAS patch (built the "debian way" > using kernel-package) version 2.6.8 built from sources and patches > retrieved via APT. i also use the debian 2.6.8 kernel with the debian skas pat

Re: [uml-user] Bridging HOWTO

hi, Am Sonntag, 1. Januar 2006 20:59 schrieb David Cannings: [..] > If any of you use your distributions init scripts to create a bridge for > use with UML, please could you drop me an email and let me know how you did > it. I'd need to know which files need to be edited and a brief description >

Re: [uml-user] Bridging HOWTO

hi, Am Dienstag, 3. Januar 2006 01:44 schrieb Juraj Holtak: > Am Montag, den 02.01.2006, 23:38 +0100 schrieb Markus Hochholdinger: > > bridge_ports eth0 tap0 tap1 tap2 > > bridge_hello 1 > > bridge_fd 1 > > bridge_stp on > is this documented