[hmm, for some reason this didn't seem to pass through
gmane... resending directly]
I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my
UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems
(updates required for newer host kernels, non-working hostfs, etc).
I am
I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my
UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems
(updates required for newer host kernels, non-working hostfs, etc).
I am now at a stage where I have linux-2.4.27 patched with
uml-2.4.27-bs2-pre7.patch and a
Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my
> > UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems
> > (updates required for newer host k
> "Jason" == Jason Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jason> Hey guys, just as an FYI, 2.6.9-skas3-v7 hosts running 2.6.9-bb4
Jason> guests works very well with software suspend 2. After
Jason> suspending my laptop and then bringing it back online, my UML
Jason> was still happily serving we
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my
> > > UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems
> > > (updates requi
Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:01, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > > Blaisorblade wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > > > > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive
> > > &g
[...two UML problems reported: one with hostfs and one with TCP over TAP...]
It's been several days of silence -- so, I'll ask -- should I:
a) supply more information,
b) wait patiently as things will get better,
c) give up on UML alltogether?
thanks,
--J.
--
I've just tried the linux-2.6.16 binary UML kernel from the new web
site, together with a guest ubuntu installation. Looks good at a first
glance, but I've hit several problems:
1) I mount /home with hostfs using the following line in fstab:
none /home hostfs /home,rw 0 0
df shows:
none
> "Jim" == Jim Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jim> Please forgive me for interpreting without suggesting how to fix,
Jim> but the interpretation might be useful. Is there any chance of
Jim> trying out the 2.6.16 UML kernel on a 2.6.16 host? Version skew,
Jim> particularly backwards, i
>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:20:16PM +0200, Jan Rychter wrote:
>> 1) I mount /home with hostfs using the following line in fstab:
>> none /home hostfs /home,rw 0 0
>>
>>
>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:20:16PM +0200, Jan Rychter wrote:
>> 1) I mount /home with hostfs using the following line in fstab:
>> none /home hostfs /home,rw 0 0
>>
>>
> "Jeff" == Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:45:34AM -0400, Samuel Korpi wrote:
[...]
>> [42949518.22] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Jeff> This isn't a crash, exactly - it's the timer complaining that it
Jeff> hasn't been called in 10 secon
> > rt_sigreturn(0x722bda19)= 1915476513
> > --- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) @ 0 (0) ---
> > rt_sigreturn(0x722bda19)= 1915476513
> > [... this goes on until there is enough "movement" in another TTY ...]
>
> But what happens here when there is movement elsewhere?
I didn
>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:11:00PM +0200, Jan Rychter wrote:
>> I didn't capture that... I've been trying to reproduce the problem,
>> but for some reason I can't, even t
14 matches
Mail list logo
