[uml-user] UML guest kernel 2.6.x problems

2005-04-08 Thread Daniel Tombeil
I googled for a while but didn't find any helpful links. Thank you & regards Daniel -- Daniel Tombeil email: dtadmindu.de --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Product

[uml-user] Still UML guest kernel 2.6.x problems

2005-04-12 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Daniel -- Forwarded Message --- From: "Daniel Tombeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:58:39 +0200 Subject: UML guest kernel 2.6.x problems Hi, I'm using UML on debian sarge. At the moment I&

Re: [uml-user] Still UML guest kernel 2.6.x problems

2005-04-13 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hello Blaisorblade, On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 19:35 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Tuesday 12 April 2005 11:41, Daniel Tombeil wrote: > > Hello, > [...] > If you use Sarge, I guess you should be able to move /lib/tls away, and it > should start working. thanks a lot. It wor

Re: [uml-user] Loadav always >1.0 (2.6.X)

2005-04-13 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hello Dave, On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 10:24 +0100, Dave Pearson wrote: > Hi > > My loadav (using kernel 2.6.9 and above) in my guest kernels is always > at least 1.0... does anyone else get this? yes, itÂs the same here. ksoftirqd is always runable. top - 21:12:12 up 4 min, 1 user, load average:

Re: [uml-user] Loadav always >1.0 (2.6.X)

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Tombeil
just nuke my previous post :-| It just looked good for then first few seconds. Now I have a 1.0 Load back even with no RTC support compiled in. I was flat-out on other things an didn't look right. regards Daniel -- Daniel Tombe

Re: [uml-user] Loadav always >1.0 (2.6.X)

2005-04-14 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hello, On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 11:41 +1200, Peter wrote: > This is something I noticed creep in at 2.6.11. Blaisorblade suggested > turning off the real time clock UML compile option. Want to try that > and reply to the list with the results? I now also tried 2.6.10 with the same result (1.0 Lo

[uml-user] GFS in UML Kernel

2005-05-04 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hi, I just tried to apply the RedHat Patches fuer GFS support to my UML kernel build tree. It compiled fine but I can't load the modules in case of some UML related symbols are missing. builduml:~# modprobe gfs gfs: Unknown symbol clear_user_skas gfs: Unknown symbol clear_user_tt FATAL: Error ins

Re: [uml-user] easiest distro to get UML running on

2005-05-12 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hi, On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 08:16 -0700, Alan wrote: > Sorry for sounding like a total newbie, but I'm doing a presentation on > UML tonight for my LUG group, and while I have it running great on my I'm using debian sarge with handcrafted kernels (host & guest). If interested, I could provide you a

[uml-user] Bootproblem with 2.6.16

2006-03-26 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hi, I built a 2.6.16 from vanilla kernel.org sources and tried to migrate my umls (Debian Sarge) to the new guest-kernel. But I can't get it running. It always freezez while accessing the root filesystem. I checked the root filesystem-image with fsck. Everything is ok. I also can boot the

Re: [uml-user] Bootproblem with 2.6.16

2006-03-26 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hi again, Quoting Daniel Tombeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi, I built a 2.6.16 from vanilla kernel.org sources and tried to migrate my umls (Debian Sarge) to the new guest-kernel. But I can't get it strange. It works fine with 2.6.15.6, the same .config and the same root-imag

[uml-user] Problems with Kernel-Panic on 2.6.16.18-bs2

2006-06-05 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hi, I've strange problems with kernel32-2.6.16.18-bs2 in my uml-setup. I'm running five uml instances on a Dual P3-866 with 1,5GB Ram. Host-System is a debian sarge with a 2.6.8-skas kernel build using the SKAS-patch coming with debian-sarge. The guest systems are debian-sarge with /lib/t

Re: [uml-user] Problems with Kernel-Panic on 2.6.16.18-bs2

2006-06-12 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hi, Quoting Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sunday 04 June 2006 16:26, Daniel Tombeil wrote: >> Hi, >> [...] > That's SIGBUS, likely (every time we've seen this) your /tmp is full when you > start the last instances (the exact location may vary in

Re: [uml-user] Problems with Kernel-Panic on 2.6.16.18-bs2

2006-06-12 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hi Jeff, thanks for your reply. Quoting Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:23:51PM +0200, Daniel Tombeil wrote: >> thanks for the pointer. I changed the size of my /dev/shm to 2G and [...] > > When the UMLs are running, you should see signif

[uml-user] Kernel-Ooops

2006-06-26 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hi, I'm getting this sometimes in my UML-instances. It doesn't crash them but I'd like to solve it. If it happens it will appear in all instances at the same time. Any idea what goes wrong here? [44059948.65] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! [44059948.65] [44059948.65] EIP: 000

Re: [uml-user] Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel mode signal 7 (with 2.6.17.1 and .2)

2006-07-03 Thread Daniel Tombeil
Hi, Quoting Stefan Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Am Samstag, den 01.07.2006, 09:49 +0200 schrieb Stefan Hofmann: > > Hi *, > >> after upgrading my (host + guest) debian system to 2.6.17.2, I often get >> an uml kernel panic like this: > > can anyone help me, please? My systems run very dirty and