On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:40:02 +0200 (CEST)
Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> There are two initializations of ndo_set_mac_address, one to a local
> function that is not used otherwise and one to a function that is defined
> elsewhere. This patch keeps the initialization to the local
On Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:32:56 +0400
Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> From: Vasiliy Kulikov
>
> Function get_inode may return ERR_PTR(...). Check for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov
> ---
> Compile tested.
>
> fs/hppfs/hppfs.c |4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:47:36 +0200
Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Under high load the file system gets corrupted.
> This patch fixes the issue.
>
> Many thanks to Janjaap Bos !
>
> LKML-Reference: gmail ! com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
> ---
> arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c |7 +--
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:29:35 +0200
Richard Weinberger wrote:
> This patch removes __do_IRQ() from user mode linux.
I'd never actually noticed CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ.
What's the plan here? Are all architectures supposed to me migrating
away from __do_IRQ() and over to generic_handle
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:28:36 +0100 Toralf F__rster
wrote:
> Using trinity I often trigger under a user mode linux image with host kernel
> 3.8.4
> and guest kernel linux-v3.9-rc3-244-g9217cbb the following :
> (The UML guest is a 32bit stable Gentoo Linux)
I assume 3.8 is OK?
>
> 2013-03-22T
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:54:03 -0400
Jeff Layton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apologies for the resend, but the original sending had the date in the
> email header and it caused some of these to bounce...
>
> ( Please consider trimming the Cc list if discussing some aspect of this
> that doesn't con
On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:45:34 -0400
Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - rename something so that unconverted filesystems will reliably fail to
> > compile?
> >
> > - leave existing filesystems alone, but add a new
> > inode_operations.setattr_jeff, which the networked filesytems c
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 08:54:35 -0400 Jeff Layton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:15:01 -0700
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 09:54:03 -0400
> > Jeff Layton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
