Re: [uml-user] [PATCH v2] um: Avoid longjmp/setjmp symbol clashes with libpthread.a

2017-06-01 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 05/24/2017 09:19 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 05/24/2017 12:02 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Florian, >> >> Am 24.05.2017 um 02:32 schrieb Florian Fainelli: >>> Building a statically linked UML kernel on a Centos 6.9 host resulted in >>> the following linking failure (GCC 4.4, glibc-2.12)

Re: [uml-user] [PATCH v2] um: Avoid longjmp/setjmp symbol clashes with libpthread.a

2017-06-01 Thread Richard Weinberger
Florian, Am 01.06.2017 um 21:38 schrieb Florian Fainelli: >> Presumably because we are not using the same glibc version? The one I >> have installed on this machine is glibc-2.12, do you want me to attach a >> copy of it? > > Richard, what do we do with this? I'd like to see the issues that Thom

Re: [uml-user] [PATCH v2] um: Avoid longjmp/setjmp symbol clashes with libpthread.a

2017-06-01 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 06/01/2017 01:11 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Florian, > > Am 01.06.2017 um 21:38 schrieb Florian Fainelli: >>> Presumably because we are not using the same glibc version? The one I >>> have installed on this machine is glibc-2.12, do you want me to attach a >>> copy of it? >> >> Richard, wh

Re: [uml-user] [PATCH v2] um: Avoid longjmp/setjmp symbol clashes with libpthread.a

2017-06-01 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 01.06.2017 um 22:15 schrieb Florian Fainelli: > On 06/01/2017 01:11 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Florian, >> >> Am 01.06.2017 um 21:38 schrieb Florian Fainelli: Presumably because we are not using the same glibc version? The one I have installed on this machine is glibc-2.12, do yo