Re: [uml-user] [PATCH 2/2] clocksource: Make clocksource register functions void

On 2014/2/6 4:40, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Yijing, > > On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, David Laight wrote: > >> From: Linuxppc-dev Tony Prisk >>> On 23/01/14 20:12, Yijing Wang wrote: Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale() functions always return 0, it's pointless, ma

Re: [uml-user] [PATCH 2/2] clocksource: Make clocksource register functions void

On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 01/23/2014 08:12 AM, Yijing Wang wrote: > > Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale() > > functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void. > > And remove the dead code that check the clocksource_register_hz()

Re: [uml-user] [PATCH 2/2] clocksource: Make clocksource register functions void

Yijing, On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, David Laight wrote: > From: Linuxppc-dev Tony Prisk > > On 23/01/14 20:12, Yijing Wang wrote: > > > Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale() > > > functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void. > > > And remove the dead cod