Around Thu 23 Jan 2014 15:12:46 +0800 or thereabout, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
> functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void.
> And remove the dead code that check the clocksource_register_hz()
> return value.
>
> S
On 2014/1/23 16:04, Tony Prisk wrote:
> On 23/01/14 20:58, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Tony Prisk wrote:
-static inline int clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs, u32
hz)
+static inline void clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs
On 01/23/2014 08:12 AM, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
> functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void.
> And remove the dead code that check the clocksource_register_hz()
> return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang
We
Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void.
And remove the dead code that check the clocksource_register_hz()
return value.
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang
---
arch/arm/mach-davinci/time.c|
clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
always return 0, so the comment is just pointless, it's
outdated, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang
---
kernel/time/clocksource.c |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/k
On 2014/1/23 16:40, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 01/23/2014 08:12 AM, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
>> functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void.
>> And remove the dead code that check the clocksource_register_hz()
>> r
From: Linuxppc-dev Tony Prisk
> On 23/01/14 20:12, Yijing Wang wrote:
> > Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
> > functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void.
> > And remove the dead code that check the clocksource_register_hz()
> > return value.
On 23/01/14 20:58, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Tony Prisk wrote:
>>>-static inline int clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs, u32
>>> hz)
>>> +static inline void clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs, u32
>>> hz)
>>>{
>>> return _
On 23/01/14 20:12, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Currently, clocksource_register() and __clocksource_register_scale()
> functions always return 0, it's pointless, make functions void.
> And remove the dead code that check the clocksource_register_hz()
> return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang
..
>
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Tony Prisk wrote:
>> -static inline int clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs, u32
>> hz)
>> +static inline void clocksource_register_hz(struct clocksource *cs, u32
>> hz)
>> {
>> return __clocksource_register_scale(cs, 1, hz);
>> }
>
>
> Thi
10 matches
Mail list logo
