On Wednesday 03 July 2013, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 07/02/2013 06:57 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> >> > On 07/02/2013 03:19 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Chen Gang
> >>> >> wrote:
> > I mean that COMPIL
On 07/03/2013 04:14 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 July 2013, Chen Gang wrote:
>> > On 07/02/2013 06:57 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Chen Gang
>>> > > wrote:
> > >> > On 07/02/2013 03:19 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> > >>> >> On Tu
'asm-generic' neither belongs to architectures nor belongs to modules,
it provides public services to both modules and architectures.
'COMPILE_TEST=y' will let 'asm-generic' provide self checking sevices to
both modules and architectures (especially with allmodconfig and
"EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W")
For m
On 07/04/2013 10:29 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 10:10 +0800, Chen Gang F T wrote:
>
>> > Select "COMPILE_TEST=y" with allmodconfig, but can not pass compiling in
>> > many architectures, one of the most reasons is "HW does not support".
>> >
>> > 'asm-generic' is really exis
On 07/04/2013 10:03 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 09:49 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>
>> > Hmm... at least, it is neither architectures issue nor modules issue.
>> >
>> > So we have to look for who have duty for it, since it is a 'generic'
>> > issue for many architectures and mod
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 10:10 +0800, Chen Gang F T wrote:
> Select "COMPILE_TEST=y" with allmodconfig, but can not pass compiling in
> many architectures, one of the most reasons is "HW does not support".
>
> 'asm-generic' is really existent for a long time, and make an important
> role for both ar
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 09:49 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> Hmm... at least, it is neither architectures issue nor modules issue.
>
> So we have to look for who have duty for it, since it is a 'generic'
> issue for many architectures and modules, we have to find it in
> 'generic' area (e.g. "./include/
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 18:12 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> confused,
Good. I thought I was the only one. Confusion loves company, that way we
can follow each other around in endless circles.
-- Steve
--
This SF.net email is
On 07/04/2013 09:23 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 18:12 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
>> > confused,
> Good. I thought I was the only one. Confusion loves company, that way we
> can follow each other around in endless circles.
If you think, this mail has already make noises to many
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:57:34AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> 'asm-generic' neither belongs to architectures nor belongs to modules,
> it provides public services to both modules and architectures.
That sentence does not make any sense to me.
> 'COMPILE_TEST=y' will let 'asm-generic' provide self
On 07/04/2013 09:12 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:57:34AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> > 'COMPILE_TEST=y' will let 'asm-generic' provide self checking sevices to
>> > both modules and architectures (especially with allmodconfig and
>> > "EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W")
> No it doesn't.
>
"If ad
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 10:42 +0800, Chen Gang F T wrote:
> Hmm..., I think maybe also has another way: get rid of 'COMPILE_TEST'
> (regress the related patch, which is only existent in next-* tree).
I'm not working on linux-next at the moment. Hmm, I'm not even working
on mainline at the moment, t
On 07/04/2013 11:06 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 10:42 +0800, Chen Gang F T wrote:
>
>> > Hmm..., I think maybe also has another way: get rid of 'COMPILE_TEST'
>> > (regress the related patch, which is only existent in next-* tree).
> I'm not working on linux-next at the momen
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:26:53AM +0800, Chen Gang F T wrote:
> Please see the related comment in "init/Kconfig" of next-* tree.
This is now in Linus's tree for 3.11.
> config COMPILE_TEST
>bool "Compile also drivers which will not load"
>default n
This has _nothing_ to do with
On 07/04/2013 12:08 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:26:53AM +0800, Chen Gang F T wrote:
>> > Please see the related comment in "init/Kconfig" of next-* tree.
> This is now in Linus's tree for 3.11.
>
OK, thanks (at least for me, it is a good news).
>> > config COMPILE_TEST
>> >
15 matches
Mail list logo
