On 2010-10-15 11:19, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Commit f81f2f7c (ubd: drop unnecessary rq->sector manipulation)
> dropped request->sector manipulation in preparation for global request
> handling cleanup; unfortunately, it incorrectly assumed that the
> updated sector wasn't being used.
>
> ubd tries to i
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can you please try this one then? It seems to work here but I can't
> reproduce the original problem reliably so I'm not really sure.
>
> Thanks.
>
> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
> index 1bcd208
Commit f81f2f7c (ubd: drop unnecessary rq->sector manipulation)
dropped request->sector manipulation in preparation for global request
handling cleanup; unfortunately, it incorrectly assumed that the
updated sector wasn't being used.
ubd tries to issue as many requests as possible to io_thread. W
Hello,
On 10/14/2010 04:20 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> It does not work for me.
> But the error is a different one. :-)
> Without your patch I've never got this kernel trace.
>
> [ 59.85] kworker/0:1: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20
Hmm... you're seeing out of memory c
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 03:14:28PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can you please try this one then? It seems to work here but I can't
> reproduce the original problem reliably so I'm not really sure.
>
> Thanks.
>
> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
> in
Hello,
Can you please try this one then? It seems to work here but I can't
reproduce the original problem reliably so I'm not really sure.
Thanks.
diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
index 1bcd208..9734994 100644
--- a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c
+++ b/arch/um/dr
