Re: [uml-user] [PATCH 00/12] move compat_ioctl handling into drivers

2009-11-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 16 November 2009, Neil Brown wrote: > I would take the md ones into my tree, but I suspect that if > everyone did that we would end up with lots of conflicts in > fs/compat_ioctl.c. > > So how about I just take the changes to md.c, and give you an: > >Acked-by: NeilBrown > > for t

Re: [uml-user] [PATCH 00/12] move compat_ioctl handling into drivers

2009-11-15 Thread Neil Brown
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:26:55 + Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This is the second series of patches on compat_ioctl handling, > moving compat handlers into more drivers. Most of these > patches consist on a part that adds a compat_ioctl method > in one driver and another part removing the respective >

[uml-user] [PATCH 00/12] move compat_ioctl handling into drivers

2009-11-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
This is the second series of patches on compat_ioctl handling, moving compat handlers into more drivers. Most of these patches consist on a part that adds a compat_ioctl method in one driver and another part removing the respective section from fs/compat_ioctl.c. The fs/compat_ioctl.c portion depen

[uml-user] [PATCH 01/12] arch/um: handle compat_ioctl in tty line driver

2009-11-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
This pushes the handling of VT specific ioctls down to the UML specific drivers so we can remove it from the common compat_ioctl.c file. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Jeff Dike Cc: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: user-mode-linux-de...@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net