Re: [uml-user] How to setup UML cluster and use ocfs2?

2007-07-30 Thread Linux Lover
Sorry for the late response. I let this be a bug. And do "git bisect bad". But when I try to build another version, it fails. So I may hit another point that UML can't build. ;) arch/um/os-Linux/aio.c: In function 'do_aio': arch/um/os-Linux/aio.c:80: error: unknown field 'aio_reserved3' specified i

Re: [uml-user] How to setup UML cluster and use ocfs2?

2007-07-30 Thread Linux Lover
Hi Jeff, It seems that aio_reserved3 was removed from (struct iocb).. So I just removing it from the initialization code in uml. Am I wrong? ;) On 7/30/07, Linux Lover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry for the late response. > I let this be a bug. And do "git bisect bad". > But when I try to

Re: [uml-user] How to setup UML cluster and use ocfs2?

2007-07-30 Thread Antoine Martin
Linux Lover wrote: > Hi Jeff, > It seems that aio_reserved3 was removed from (struct iocb).. > So I just removing it from the initialization code in uml. > Am I wrong? ;) That also works, see my post from 2 days ago. Or this patch from Jeff: http://marc.info/?l=user-mode-linux-devel&m=1185219822270

Re: [uml-user] How to setup UML cluster and use ocfs2?

2007-07-30 Thread Jeff Dike
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 03:38:07PM +0800, Linux Lover wrote: > It seems that aio_reserved3 was removed from (struct iocb).. > So I just removing it from the initialization code in uml. > Am I wrong? ;) Antoine beat me to it, but removing the obsolete fields will work fine.

Re: [uml-user] Problem with 2.6.22.1 uml kernel and cow

2007-07-30 Thread Blaisorblade
On venerdì 27 luglio 2007, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 04:27:30PM -0400, Mark Lidd wrote: > > Error: > > > > ubda: unknown partition table > > VFS: mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly > > kernel panic -not sync'ing: operation too long" > > > > This is fixed in 2.6.23-rc1 (and h

Re: [uml-user] Problem with 2.6.22.1 uml kernel and cow

2007-07-30 Thread Jeff Dike
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 06:07:53PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > This is fixed in 2.6.23-rc1 (and hopefully will be in 2.6.23.1 when it > > is released). > > You obviously mean 2.6.22.1, don't you? Yes, sorry. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com