Re: [uml-user] kernel+image compat matrix?

2007-07-05 Thread Blaisorblade
On martedì 26 giugno 2007, Richard Andrews wrote: > --- Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Recent distros (except slackware) may not work with 2.4 (udev/devfs/etc) > > but apart from that any recent 2.6 kernel should do (bearing in mind > > that few bugfixes are backported (except for 2.

Re: [uml-user] kernel+image compat matrix?

2007-07-05 Thread Antoine Martin
Blaisorblade wrote: >> then all is well - just my >> inexperience showing. But it would also be nice to have an indication one >> way or the other in a prominent place. >> > > Well, stating clearly such a thing is a very good idea - can you do it, > Antoine? > Sure, the only issue that I

Re: [uml-user] kernel+image compat matrix?

2007-07-05 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 06:10:34PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > Getting a few people to report which combinations do/don't work would > also be quite helpful. The BusyBox image just seems broken. If you loop-mount it and chroot bin/sh into it, it dies with a SIGFPX.

Re: [uml-user] kernel+image compat matrix?

2007-07-05 Thread Antoine Martin
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 06:10:34PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > >> Getting a few people to report which combinations do/don't work would >> also be quite helpful. >> > > The BusyBox image just seems broken. If you loop-mount it and chroot > bin/sh into it, it dies wit

Re: [uml-user] kernel+image compat matrix?

2007-07-05 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 09:54:33PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote: > >The BusyBox image just seems broken. If you loop-mount it and chroot > >bin/sh into it, it dies with a SIGFPX. > > > Is this the 32-bit or 64-bit? 32-bit. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com -

Re: [uml-user] kernel+image compat matrix?

2007-07-05 Thread Richard Andrews
--- Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Blaisorblade wrote: > >> But it would also be nice to have an indication one > >> way or the other in a prominent place. > > > > Well, stating clearly such a thing is a very good idea - can you do it, > > Antoine? > > > Getting a few people to r

Re: [uml-user] kernel+image compat matrix?

2007-07-05 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:53:15AM +1000, Richard Andrews wrote: > I still wish for kernel + image packs. Newbie, do this: > * tar xzf uml-nagafix-deb-sarge-1.0.tar.gz > * ./uml-nagafix-deb-sarge-1.0/run.sh > > If you give someone a dead easy entry point like this it encourages adoption. I thin

Re: [uml-user] unlock_kernel symbol

2007-07-05 Thread Blaisorblade
On giovedì 28 giugno 2007, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 07:04:08PM +0100, kototama kototama wrote: > > I can't load a module inside a uml system. I've got the following error: > > > > Unknown symbol unlock_kernel > > Unknown symbol lock_kernel > > > > I know these functions should not