On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 09:45:56AM +0700, Mikado wrote:
> I wonder if I should run UML with skas3 patch in grsec system?
I have no personal experience, but from what I've heard, there are some
conflicts which would need to be resolved. However, there are no fundamental
reasons both can't be in th
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:29:17AM -0500, Jeremy Anderson wrote:
> guest machines randomly crash. They aren't sending me anything via
> syslog (I've configured them to log to the host machine), and they don't
> appear to log anything to STDOUT. I can make machines crash with the
> message in t
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 04:58:08PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If you are using sparse file for swap files I don't think it will
take more than tenth of that space.
Swapping onto a sparse file is really a bad idea. What happens if the
host filesystem fills up and the UML tries to swap? The
> In the host side of tap device the mac address seems to be random
> but it seems like in guest side the mac address is derived from
> first given ip-address
Correct.
> and when using dhcp it's always 0.0.0.0 which
> causes it to be fe:fd:00:00:00:00. The problem is that I can't seem
> to be ab
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When you're DHCP-ing, you need to provide a MAC on the command line
> because that's the only way that the DHCP server can identify the
> client.
No it isn't. DHCP can arbitrate between clients based on MAC or:
- sent host name
- sent dhcp client identifie
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:47:51AM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
> I've upgraded a Gentoo amd64 box to the latest gcc (4.1.1) and glibc
> (2.4-r3). glibc 2.4 is "nptlonly" (at least on gentoo?)
The host filesystem or the UML filesystem was upgraded? If the latter,
can you make it avilable for me
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:16:36PM +0530, Suman Adak wrote:
> I am a just new user in UML. Can anybody please tell or point out any
> link ,how do i develop device driver under UML?. i complied UML from
> source and working fine.
That depends very heavily on the type of driver.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 03:16:58PM +0200, Paolo Carpo wrote:
> I would like to know if exist any documents about how UML manage the CPU: how
> the CPU of the real PC is devided between the istances of the UML VMs.
UMLs are normal processes, so they are scheduled just like any other process
on the
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 01:09:15AM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
> I thought it might be GCC 4.1, so I tried 2 things:
> * build with gcc 3.4 on another host
> * switch to gcc 3.4 on that system for the kernel build
> The resulting (statically linked) kernel runs fine on x86 but not at all
> on the
> > UML running in SKAS0 mode
> > remove_umid_dir - actually_do_remove failed with err = -2
>
> Add stderr=1 to the command line and see what happens.
Nothing happens, same output as above.
> Also, if a 32-bit binary behaves differently on a 64-bit system than a
> 32-bit one, I would say that's a
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 05:32:36PM +0100, Nic James Ferrier wrote:
> Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > When you're DHCP-ing, you need to provide a MAC on the command line
> > because that's the only way that the DHCP server can identify the
> > client.
>
> No it isn't. DHCP can arbitrat
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 12:59 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:47:51AM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
> > I've upgraded a Gentoo amd64 box to the latest gcc (4.1.1) and glibc
> > (2.4-r3). glibc 2.4 is "nptlonly" (at least on gentoo?)
>
> The host filesystem or the UML filesystem
12 matches
Mail list logo
