Re: [uml-user] rootstrap problem

2006-08-03 Thread robl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ linux --showconfig | grep BLK_DEV_UBD CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBD=y CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBD_SYNC=y Appears to be enabled ... On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 09:36:59 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote > On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:16:18PM +0100, robl wrote: > > [42949375.37] VFS: Cannot open root device "98:0

Re: [uml-user] rootstrap problem

2006-08-03 Thread robl
I'm using 2.6 kernels as the host and guest kernels ... I've just been looking round and it appears rootstrap doesn't work with 2.6 kernels - is that anybody else's understanding ? If so, I guess I've answered my own question ! On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:19:22 +, Stefano Melchior wrote > On Thu,

Re: [uml-user] rootstrap problem

2006-08-03 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Thu, August 3, 2006 3:36 pm, Jeff Dike said: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:16:18PM +0100, robl wrote: >> [42949375.37] VFS: Cannot open root device "98:0" or >> unknown-block(98,0) >> [42949375.37] Please append a correct "root=" boot option >> [42949375.37] Kernel panic - not syncing

[uml-user] rootstrap problem

2006-08-03 Thread robl
Hi, I'm having a problem with rootstrap on Debian Sarge. When I run rootstrap ./root_fs The uml instance fails to boot with : [42949375.37] Initializing software serial port version 1 [42949375.37] Failed to open '/', errno = 21 [42949375.37] ubdb: unknown partition table [429493

Re: [uml-user] rootstrap problem

2006-08-03 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:16:18PM +0100, robl wrote: > [42949375.37] VFS: Cannot open root device "98:0" or unknown-block(98,0) > [42949375.37] Please append a correct "root=" boot option > [42949375.37] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on > unknown-block(98,0)

Re: [uml-user] rootstrap problem

2006-08-03 Thread robl
Hi, You can find my install writeup at http://www.monkeyhelper.com/2006/06/installing_user_mode_linux_on.html I'm running Debian Sarge stable with SKAS patch (see the writeup) and then as my host UML kernel I'm using a blaisorblade precompiled kernel32-2.6.16.18-bs2 The strange thing is I'm su

Re: [uml-user] rootstrap problem

2006-08-03 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:27:18PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > As far as I remember the old sarge rootstrap relies on DEVFS which is not > that easy to enable in recent kernels :) If this is the issue, then you need a newer rootstrap - devfs is now officially gone from the kernel.

Re: [uml-user] Promiscuous mode interface bug?

2006-08-03 Thread Stephens, Allan
Hi Paolo: Here are the latest results of my testing of uml_switch. Guest 1 has eth0=daemon,00:00:00:00:11:00 Guest 2 has eth0=daemon,00:00:00:00:22:00 and eth1=daemon,00:00:00:00:22:11 When I do my testing using "uml_switch" (no hub), all interfaces seem to see only the packets that have been se

Re: [uml-user] [uml-devel] Promiscuous mode interface bug?

2006-08-03 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 09:29:51AM -0700, Stephens, Allan wrote: > These differences may make sense to people who understand how the > various transport mechanisms work, but it still leave me with a > question: why, in the latter two cases, is UML allowing non-promiscuous > interfaces to receive tr

Re: [uml-user] [uml-devel] Promiscuous mode interface bug?

2006-08-03 Thread Stephens, Allan
Hi Jeff: See comments below. > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Dike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:26 PM > To: Stephens, Allan > Cc: Paolo Giarrusso; > user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; > user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re

Re: [uml-user] rootstrap problem

2006-08-03 Thread robl
Hi, Just a quick note to say I installed a Debian Sarge (Testing) release and I managed to generate a root_fs fine, so it looks like Sarge stable rootstrap has issues one way or another but subsequent releases are fine. Thanks for all the help, Rob On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:45:03 +, Stefano Mel

Re: [uml-user] [uml-devel] Promiscuous mode interface bug?

2006-08-03 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 01:08:51PM -0700, Stephens, Allan wrote: > Where I think my confusion is arising is in the details of how the > filtering > controlled by the promiscuous setting is actually done. If a packet > with > the "wrong" destination address arrives at an interface, who checks to >

[uml-user] Debugging Modules in SKAS Mode

2006-08-03 Thread Rick Spillane
How do I debug modules with the new UML? I searched around the old website, and the link pointing to the handy-sounding script that does it for you is broken (http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/dl-sf#UML%20utilities), this link came from http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/debugging.html und

[uml-user] Debugging Modules in SKAS Mode: Wrong List

2006-08-03 Thread Rick Spillane
I apologize, this is the wrong list. -- Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business top

[uml-user] how everything goin

2006-08-03 Thread janine fields
Hey, been to the gym but not getting the outcome you have been expecting. I am, but things changed when I glanced at these guys at http://www.ggcx.donesoonnows.org/er/ Its what the great athletes are using, so why not having spent considerable reflect time confident hunting Physical Educat