On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 09:12:53AM +0200, Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote:
Hi Raz,
> actually i have done a while ago and it passes the boot .
> yet i fear that i have to create a new root_fs since it fails
> while trying to mount it.
> does anyone has a pointer to root_fs for linux-2.6.15 .
>
> On 2/2
Hello friends I am trying to build a plugin in eclipse to administer the User mode linux. I downloaded the precompiled uml binaries and utilities from sourceforge.net. I am using the slackware filesystem that too also downloaded from sourceforge.net. When I use the proc command in mconsole i alway
(uml_blowfis) proc cpuinfo
OK
processor : 0
vendor_id : User Mode Linux
model name : UML
mode: skas
host: Linux xaser 2.6.15.2-skas3-v9-pre8 #1 SMP Sat Feb 4
16:08:58 CET 2006 i686
bogomips: 4757.91
@Blaisorblade
the instance name is uml_blowfish. W
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 12:44, Dinesh Kannan wrote:
> Hello friends
> I am trying to build a plugin in eclipse to administer the User mode
> linux. I downloaded the precompiled uml binaries and utilities from
> sourceforge.net.
I.e. you're using 2.4.19-5um? Don't!
On my homepage
http://ww
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 01:52, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Excellent, the difference in speed is noticeable. no benchmarks yet, but
> the load on the host seems lower.
> Any idea what this is:
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel mode fault at addr 0x0, ip 0x4b20
This is strange - ip 0x4b2
> disassemble 0x4b20 0x4b40
(gdb) disassemble 0x4b20 0x4b40
Dump of assembler code from 0x4b20 to 0x4b40:
0x4b20: Cannot access memory at address 0x4b20
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
0xa02aebb1 in kill () at err.h:24
Title: Build error in arch/um/os-Linux/aio.c with today's 2.6.16-rc4 patch set
It appears to me that the kernel tree will not build with the 2.6.16-rc4 patch set I downloaded today, if HAVE_AIO_ABI is not defined.
finish_aio_26() is referenced in arch/um/os-Linux/aio.c, but is not defined.
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Run a UML on the one machine you have root on as the gateway to the
> outside world - either with TUN/TAP or a uml_switch attached to a
> TUN/TAP device.
okay, I am trying to implement your suggestion (I am starting with
getting this single UML up and runni
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 19:04, Benjamin Rutt wrote:
> Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Run a UML on the one machine you have root on as the gateway to the
> > outside world - either with TUN/TAP or a uml_switch attached to a
> > TUN/TAP device.
> okay, I am trying to implement your su
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:52:00AM +, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Jeff, you may want to add a link from the main site now (most of the
> images have had enough testing now and the ones that do not work are
> marked with 'DO NOT USE' - mostly because of tls issues)
Done (or at least will be once SF
Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And the solution is not to add a route back (which obviously wouldn't scale,
> and wouldn't work when pinging outside hosts), but to use Source NAT /
> masquerading (-j SNAT / -j MASQUERADE). The same way you'd have to do if
> sharing a dialup / home c
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 02:08:13PM -0600, John Dykstra wrote:
> > That got me further. I ran into the "set_thread_area failed when
> > setting up thread-local storage" problem, found your post on the
> > mailing list, and added
> "LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/lib/obsolete/linuxthreads"
> > to the comman
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:52:00AM +, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Any idea what this is:
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel mode fault at addr 0x0, ip 0x4b20
> deactivate_all_fds failed, errno = 9
This is the Slackware image from your site? And a stock i386 UML? Which
version?
I think I n
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:37:57PM -0600, John Dykstra wrote:
> With the 2.6.16-rc4 patch set, I'm still getting the "set_thread_area
> failed" error.
>
> The TLS patches in that set assume that the host OS provides thread-area
> syscalls, doesn't it? I'm running RH8.
I bet it does. I haven't t
> > The TLS patches in that set assume that the host OS provides
> > thread-area syscalls, doesn't it? >
>
> That being said, it would be nice to see if it can be
> emulated somehow.
Agreed, but I'm not the man for the job. I don't know anything about
that corner of the kernel.
-- John
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 16:08 -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel mode fault at addr 0x0, ip 0x4b20
> > deactivate_all_fds failed, errno = 9
>
> This is the Slackware image from your site? And a stock i386 UML? Which
> version?
ok, it wasn't the stock versions, but t
I've got another cannot-boot problem. My UML is built from 2.6.16-rc4
source, with Jeff's patch set and the defconfig configuration. My root
filesystem is
http://www.stearns.org/uml-root/root_fs.fc-3-base.pristine.20050605.bz2,
with MAKEDEV std, generic, and the ubd0 etc. devices created per the
Hello friends, I am trying to build a tool that should display the process running in the UML. The tool should display the information as if I were issuing a 'ps' or 'top' command. Can anyone help me in this regard. Thanks.
Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket
Yahoo! Messenger Mob
Hi friends I want to know whether I can able to run 2.6 based UML kernel over a 2.4 based host kernel. I still use the Red Hat 9.0 distribution with the kernel 2.4.20-8. Will I will be able to run a 2.6 based UML kernel on it. Please anyone post a message regarding this. Thanks.
Jiyo
19 matches
Mail list logo
