Re: [uml-user] Strearns' root filesystems with other kernels

2005-08-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 13:11, Väisänen Teemu wrote: > Hello. > > Is it possible to use Stearns' root_fs -files with other kernels than > found from http://www.stearns.org/uml-root/ and/or has someone did > that? > > I have Fedora Core 3, with 2.6.11 SKAS patched host kernel and 2.6.10 > guest k

Re: [uml-user] several uml, bridge, tuntap, several tapX, eth

2005-08-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 19 August 2005 02:24, Markus Hochholdinger wrote: > Hi, > > i've now spend half a day to find out that the default MAC-address set by > uml is FE:FD:00:00:00:00. > That was the reason for my bad network connectivity to several umls on one > host bridged the local network to the umls over

Re: [uml-user] performance of block devices resp. filesystems

2005-08-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Saturday 20 August 2005 15:39, Markus Hochholdinger wrote: > Hi, > > Am Samstag, 20. August 2005 15:16 schrieb Markus Hochholdinger: > > Uhm, i now have to test this with async ubd devices because i had the > > sync option for ubd on. About the host FS, I've seen a paper from LinuxSymposium2005

Re: [uml-user] several uml, bridge, tuntap, several tapX, eth

2005-08-22 Thread Markus Hochholdinger
Hi, Am Montag, 22. August 2005 17:24 schrieb Blaisorblade: > If your distro, instead of doing: > ifconfig eth0 up > ifconfig eth0 , does > ifconfig eth0 , then UML will decide the Mac address based on the > IP address (will be FE:FD:). yeah, but i forget to tell that i use kernel level configurat

Re: Fwd: [uml-user] Howto install UML for 2.6.8.1-kernel

2005-08-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 18:15, George P Boutwell wrote: > On 8/16/05, Jelle Boomstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 16 August 2005 17:44, Marco Garcês wrote: > > > >Well, it turn out, that one program needs 2.6.10 -kernel, so I need it > > > >as guest -kernel. I haven't find out UML-pa

Re: [uml-user] Modules on-off - 2.6.10-5-386

2005-08-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 18 August 2005 14:35, Riccardo Bianconi wrote: > I'm tring to install uml on ubuntu with 2.6.10 kernel. > > If I made > - make mrproper ARCH=um > - make xconfig ARCH=um > - load the defconfig file in arch/um > --> remove module option <--- This will turn anything which is enabled as "mo

Re: [uml-user] several uml, bridge, tuntap, several tapX, eth

2005-08-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 22 August 2005 18:09, Markus Hochholdinger wrote: > Hi, > > Am Montag, 22. August 2005 17:24 schrieb Blaisorblade: > > If your distro, instead of doing: > > ifconfig eth0 up > > ifconfig eth0 , does > > ifconfig eth0 , then UML will decide the Mac address based on > > the IP address (will

Re: [uml-user] several uml, bridge, tuntap, several tapX, eth

2005-08-22 Thread Markus Hochholdinger
Hi, Am Montag, 22. August 2005 19:22 schrieb Blaisorblade: > That's VERY interesting. But UML's trick to variate the MAC was never > tested in that case. Is that the one enabled by CONFIG_IP_PNP (i.e. "IP: > kernel level autoconfiguration")? yes. > It seems yes, and that code seem to have the s

Re: [uml-user] several uml, bridge, tuntap, several tapX, eth

2005-08-22 Thread Jason Lunz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > If your distro, instead of doing: > ifconfig eth0 up > ifconfig eth0 , does > ifconfig eth0 , then UML will decide the Mac address based on the IP > address (will be FE:FD:). Has any thought been given to just choosing a random mac? I haven't looked closely, but it seems