Re: [uml-user] no Files > 2G via HostFS possible

2005-07-22 Thread Jörg Rennefeld
On Thursday 21 July 2005 22:10, Jörg Rennefeld wrote: On Thursday 21 July 2005 14:59, Jörg Rennefeld wrote: Hi, I have the following problem: I can't create files bigger than 2GB on the Host Disk from inside a UML. Is the Hostfs driver limited to 2GB? I always get the error message

Re: [uml-user] UML using 100% CPU after mounting root filesystem

2005-07-22 Thread Ruaidhri Power
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:23:46AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > Which was the old UML version? Which is your guest distro? > Also, have you tested the old UML releases on this new host kernel version? > Since UML address space is getting shrinked down to 32M, I fear address space > randomization

Re: [Fwd: Re: [uml-user] x86_64 UML won't boot on IBM x336]

2005-07-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 22 July 2005 05:54, Phill Wombat wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > Thanks for the reply. > > I've disabled exec-shield and it's made no difference. (sysctl -w > kernel.exec-shield=0). Try also following this (from another email) - it appeared in vanilla 2.6.12 and may be in your FC4 kernel. Not su

Re: [uml-user] UML using 100% CPU after mounting root filesystem

2005-07-22 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 22 July 2005 18:53, Ruaidhri Power wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:23:46AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > Which was the old UML version? Which is your guest distro? > > Also, have you tested the old UML releases on this new host kernel > > version? Since UML address space is getting s

[uml-user] 2.6.12.3-bb8-skas0 crashes in skas0 mode

2005-07-22 Thread Jason Lunz
I applied the -bb8-skas0 patches to 2.6.12.3 (omitting uml-revert-fork-instead-of-clone.patch because it's already in 2.6.12.3). It's been running well, but I just got this crash while the guest was running "tar c": tar: Removing leading `/' from member names Kernel panic - not syncing: Segfault w

Re: [uml-user] DevFS going to go away in 2.6.13

2005-07-22 Thread Sven Köhler
> As was announced a lot of time ago, DevFS is going to go away... in 2.6.13, > the configuration option for DevFS has been disabled (i.e. you cannot choose > any more to enable it), and the code will probably removed altogether for > subsequent releases. > > So, if you plan to upgrade (and avo