Hi, I'm a newbie...it's maybe a very basic question.
I got a task and have to connect 2 UMLs through tty, but I don't have a
clear idea about this staff. Does it mean that I should assign a console of
each UML to the same tty of the host? How can I do that?
Thanks for any help!
_
Hi,
I remember there was a patch for uml, changing the architecture to i586,
forcing glibc not to use /lib/tls.
Someone knows where I can find it ?
The thing is: if I do a 'apt-get upgrade' I have a good chance that the
system is half-dead after then.
Or is there another way of disableing tls,
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 12:02, Sebastian Böhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I remember there was a patch for uml, changing the architecture to i586,
> forcing glibc not to use /lib/tls.
>
> Someone knows where I can find it ?
It's in
http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/uml/patches/
named uml-pretend-to-be-i586 (browse th
Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I remember there was a patch for uml, changing the architecture to i586,
> > forcing glibc not to use /lib/tls.
> >
> > Someone knows where I can find it ?
> It's in
> http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/uml/patches/
> named uml-pretend-to-be-i586 (browse the ap
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 21:16 schrieb Blaisorblade:
> On Monday 09 May 2005 16:31, Markus Schulz wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > i've got segmentation faults with every self-made program based on
> > pthread library in my debian-sarge guest system.
> > On my host there is an debian-sarge 2.6.11.6-skas3-v8
Note, you can prevent /lib/tls from becoming an issue on apt-get upgrade
by using dpkg-divert. e.g. per the debian script here:
http://downloads.rimuhosting.com/debiantls.sh
But hopefully this will be a moot point shortly after Blaisorblade
releases those tls patches be mentioned a week or so
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 14:21, Peter wrote:
> Note, you can prevent /lib/tls from becoming an issue on apt-get upgrade
> by using dpkg-divert. e.g. per the debian script here:
> http://downloads.rimuhosting.com/debiantls.sh
>
> But hopefully this will be a moot point shortly after Blaisorblade
> re
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 13:30, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I remember there was a patch for uml, changing the architecture to
> > > i586, forcing glibc not to use /lib/tls.
> > >
> > > Someone knows where I can find it ?
> >
> > It's in
> > http://www.suse.de/~
On Tue, 10 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
> Exporting in the environment LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 should also work, and is
> a
> bit more reliable in theory (because a distro *could* compile /lib/tls to
> even work on i486, I've heard; since no distro does it, this remains
> theory).
Indeed
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 17:23, Nix wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
> > Exporting in the environment LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 should also work, and
> > is a bit more reliable in theory (because a distro *could* compile
> > /lib/tls to even work on i486, I've heard; since no distr
I'm trying to use an iso or cramfs image as a ubd device with a command
line option. However, I am unable to mount either iso9660 or cramfs
type filesystems. This is the setup:
host$ mkdir iso_tmp
host$ mkdir cramfs_tmp
host$ echo hello > iso_tmp/hello.txt
host$ echo hello > cramfs_tmp/hello.txt
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:06:37PM -0700, Casey T. Deccio wrote:
> uml# mount -t iso9660 /dev/ubd1 /opt
What minors are you using for /dev/ubd1 and /dev/ubd2?
Jeff
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Sp
12 matches
Mail list logo
