On Friday 06 May 2005 19:38, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Now, I've hit some real problems. I've managed to crash the host twice
> within a short period of time.
> I captured the messages from a serial
> console the second time
Would you check that you haven't got an hardware problem?
The stack trace
On Friday 06 May 2005 17:09, Antoine Martin wrote:
> > The 64-bit guest boots into existing 32-bit root_fs without problems, I
> > will rebuild all my 64-bit guests and let you know how this goes.
>
> Actually, I got mixed up, the 64-bit filesystems worked but the 32-bit
> didn't. I couldn't find a
On Friday 06 May 2005 15:12, Jason Clark wrote:
> SHould be possible using COW files. Create your bootable CD, then create
> a COW file that exists on the CD. Then, mount a partion as tmpfs and place
> your RW file there. You will have to create the RW file at every boot
> obviously.
> I wonder i
On Saturday 07 May 2005 21:24, Dick Middleton wrote:
> Anybody got a patch for host skas which works for the Debian 2.6.11
> kernel source? The 2,6,10 patch fails with 2.6.11.
Yes, the 2.6.10 patch fails even with vanilla 2.6.11. Try the one for vanilla
2.6.11, no?
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaiso
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 17:53 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Friday 06 May 2005 19:38, Antoine Martin wrote:
> > Now, I've hit some real problems. I've managed to crash the host twice
> > within a short period of time.
>
> > I captured the messages from a serial
> > console the second time
> Would
On Sunday 08 May 2005 00:48, Chas Wareing wrote:
> Good Afternoon Blaisorblade --
>
> Wanted to run something quick past you -
>
> Can one compile a 32bit guest kernel on a 64bit host using SKAS/SYSEMU?
> Special options?
Something like SUBARCH=i386 CFLAGS=-m32 LDFLAGS=-m32 should more or less do
I can't figure out how to use the pcap transport within a working
bridged environment: do I need a dedicated interface on the host to
attach to or can I reuse an interface already bound to a bridge?
I've got 'eth0 up promisc' on the host, attached to a bridge, I want to
start a UML instance with pc
> > Also, will there be a performance benefit from running uml 32bit guest on a
> > 64bit host (now or planned?)
> Difficult question... the host OS will anyway run faster and that will
> benefit
> a bit UML, but I don't know how much that is. However, for now you have the
> big disadvantage tha
Blaisorblade wrote:
On Saturday 07 May 2005 21:24, Dick Middleton wrote:
Anybody got a patch for host skas which works for the Debian 2.6.11
kernel source? The 2,6,10 patch fails with 2.6.11.
Yes, the 2.6.10 patch fails even with vanilla 2.6.11. Try the one for vanilla
2.6.11, no?
Scrub last mess
Hi,
One UML instance I stopped got this in its log (screen is a useful
thing...).
I don't understand what's going on, but I thought I'd report it, hoping
it allows you to improbe UML.
By the way, this is self compiled from vanilla 2.6.11.6. I think I
cannot provide the kernel configuration beca
10 matches
Mail list logo
