Hi,
I've any problems with network and UML. Somebody have a documentation
on how to configure the network?
I try with Tuntap transport but i lose my connection on my own host
computer and in UML computer, i've not network...
Tuntap is the better solution?
My configuration host computer :
tu
Hi,
Slirp as network is broken for the current uml kernels.
Will this be fixed anytime soon?
Tor Håkon Gjerde
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop repor
On Wednesday 26 January 2005 12:41, Tor Håkon Gjerde wrote:
> Hi,
> Slirp as network is broken for the current uml kernels.
> Will this be fixed anytime soon?
I don't know if anyone cares... you can change it (read below).
We didn't know at all it's broken, so it's not widely used.
Also, are you
> Don't need a sepcial kernel. I think the linux binary can't see your
> TMPDIR variable.
> Try to lsof | grep /var/local/afprod2/tmp to check the usage the tmpfs.
I used TMP now as Blaisorblade suggested.
# lsof | grep /var/local/afprod2/tmp
linux 25022 afprod2 memDEL 0,11
Hello Romain,
> I've any problems with network and UML. Somebody have a documentation on
> how to configure the network? I try with Tuntap transport but i lose my
> connection on my own host computer and in UML computer, i've not network...
> Tuntap is the better solution?
I don't know what is wr
Jeff, I've seen the beginning of your work on back-porting all the patches
from 2.6 to 2.4...
It's a huge work, but what is more important, it could obviously hurt
stability...
So, I'd suggest to follow this policy to choose the work to merge:
- reduce *a lot* what is going to be merged... no
+1
For my purposes I need solid, stable code. I prefer a a 2.4 and 2.6
kernel that builds without too many config gotchas. And runs reliably.
e.g. right now I am using the blaisorblade 2.6.9-bs patches and the
pre-hostfs 2.4 code. That works well.
I'm all for different UML trees/patches tha
