Roland,
Forgot to send the answer to the list as well.
Roland Kaeser wrote:
This was exactly the problem. Many thanks
You're welcome.
--- Ramon van Alteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Roland Kaeser wrote:
Hello
I have weird behavior of the uml network interfaces when I run the uml guest as
a
no
Hi, i have a problem with swap
partition:
OS Host: Fedora Core2 SKAS v7.
OS Guest: Fedora Core2 UML kernel
2.6.9 bb4
Activating swap partitions: swapon:
/dev/ubd/1: No such device or address[FAILED]
.
..
Enabling local filesystem quotas: [
OK ]swapon: /dev/ubd/1: No such device
Hi, Yena,
Inside your uml you have to specify :
/dev/ubd16 noneswap
outside UML inside UML
/dev/ubd0 /dev/ubd0
/dev/ubd1 /dev/ubd16
/dev/ubd2 /dev/ubd32
...
Regards,
Jurgen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
I tried it with the bb4 patch on a athlon 1000. But I get a loud crash with a
long
kernel panic message from the guest kernel which causes that the crashed kernel
process is not killable anymore which causes the need of restarting the host
system
to get rid of this crashed kernel process.
i've got problems while shutting down with the bb4 too.
> Hello
>
> I tried it with the bb4 patch on a athlon 1000. But I get a loud crash
> with a long
> kernel panic message from the guest kernel which causes that the crashed
> kernel
> process is not killable anymore which causes the need of
Hi jurgen, i have modified my /etc/fstab and now is:
/dev/ubd/0 / ext2defaults0 1
/dev/ubd/16 noneswapdefaults0 0
none/dev/ptsdevpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0
proc/proc proc
This is my /etc/fstab:
/dev/ubd/0 / ext2defaults0 1
/dev/ubd/1 swapswapdefaults0 0
none/dev/ptsdevpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0
proc/proc procdefaults0 0
This
hmm. very odd. I have not had the same experience with bb4. It's been
rock solid on gentoo 2004.3 UMLs. Are the both of you running fedora
kernels or are you running vanilla kernels as a host ?
Jason
We the willing, led by the unknowning, are doing the impossible, for the
ungrateful. We
my host system is a debian 2.6.9-skas3-v7.
> hmm. very odd. I have not had the same experience with bb4. It's been
> rock solid on gentoo 2004.3 UMLs. Are the both of you running fedora
> kernels or are you running vanilla kernels as a host ?
>
> Jason
> We the willing, led by the unk
Hello
I don't using the fedora kernel. I've compiled my own with the hosts sks patch
Roland
--- Jason Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> hmm. very odd. I have not had the same experience with bb4. It's been
> rock solid on gentoo 2004.3 UMLs. Are the both of you running fedora
> kernels
Likewise. But yesterday evening I noticed that sometimes the
process hangs after 'Power Down', and sometimes I get a
segmentation violation. Can anyone do something with a
stackdump ?
Jurgen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2004-12-21 11:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
11 matches
Mail list logo