This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 23:20:06 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Request
Your message is being returned; it has been enqueued and undeliverable for
> > > > Do you know if and what version of the skas patch the SuSE kernel uses?
>
> > > Gerd, do you have an opinion :-)? (Gerd works for SuSE --> hint hint).
>
> > Isn't a specific version, it's based on some old skas patch (not fully
> > sure whenever sf.net or a early bb one) with misc fixes m
> -Original Message-
> From: Blaisorblade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 6:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Sala, Roger
> Subject: Re: [uml-user] RE: User-mode-linux-user digest, Vol 1 #1812 -
> 10 msgs
> >
> > fyi, Here are the results of two other host/gu
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 13:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Blaisorblade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 6:54 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: Sala, Roger
> > Subject: Re: [uml-user] RE: User-mode-linux-user digest, Vol 1 #1
Can I quote from "Patch list"?
2.4 guest patches.
For these ones, instead, download uml-patch-2.4.24-1base.patch.bz2, apply it
on a 2.4.27 kernel and apply on top of it the latest -bs release, which
currently is 2.4.27-1bs.
On the site, you also find the link.
Please read things - I'm tired of
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 14:50, Franck wrote:
> > Can I quote from "Patch list"?
> >
> > 2.4 guest patches.
> >
> > For these ones, instead, download uml-patch-2.4.24-1base.patch.bz2, apply
> > it on a 2.4.27 kernel and apply on top of it the latest -bs release,
> > which currently is 2.4.27-1bs
Hey gang, just thought I would post this quick and dirty on how to build
gentoo from stage 1 inside of a 2.6.9-bb4 UML. BTW, the bb4 patch seems
to be really solid. I haven't run into a single issue with it thus far.
Building gentoo from stage 1 inside a UML
First create root_fs (creates a 2gig
Hi,
Is anyone have a mini sarge base filesystem guest who's working with
2.6.9 guest uml kernel.
I have a sarge UML who's working very fine with 2.4.26 but, when i'm
lauching the same with 2.6.9 guest, boot block on mounting FS (ext3).
I've found a doc with /devfs and nomount but, nothing work.
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 11:13, Paul Warren wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 03:50:40AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > > host-skas3-2.4.25-v3.patch
> > >
> > > The offending patch:
> > >
> > > 82:a:uml-refuse-to-run-without-skas-if-no-tt-mode-in-fix
> >
> > Ok, you're fairly handy with patch-scr
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 16:23, Franck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone have a mini sarge base filesystem guest who's working with
> 2.6.9 guest uml kernel.
> I have a sarge UML who's working very fine with 2.4.26 but, when i'm
> lauching the same with 2.6.9 guest, boot block on mounting FS (ext3).
T
Hi,
Is anyone have a mini sarge base filesystem guest who's working with
2.6.9 guest uml kernel.
I have a sarge UML who's working very fine with 2.4.26 but, when i'm
lauching the same with 2.6.9 guest, boot block on mounting FS (ext3).
Tried renaming away /lib/tls?
I've found a doc with /devfs and
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 10:13, Jason Clark wrote:
> Hey gang, just thought I would post this quick and dirty on how to build
> gentoo from stage 1 inside of a 2.6.9-bb4 UML. BTW, the bb4 patch seems
> to be really solid. I haven't run into a single issue with it thus far.
Ok, it means that th
Thanks for the tip on NPTL. I will be sure to add it to the clean version
that Im working on now. I should have it done by the end of this week at
the latest.
Yeah, Stage1 assumes that you are in a chroot and that it has no need to
mount filesystems or to add routes/interfaces. So you have to
Hello all,
I could use some advice on recovering uml guest systems. I had a uml
host server burn out its hard drive on me. I managed to mount the
partition holding all the uml guest systems and copy them off the drive.
I have now built a new host system using gentoo and the
gentoo-dev-sourc
More info on the guest system kernel panics ... here is some relevant
dmesg output:
Using anticipatory io scheduler
mtime mismatch (1079561920 vs 1102205165) of COW header vs backing file
/dev/ubd/disc1: unknown partition table
Initializing stdio console driver
VFS: Cannot open root device "98:0"
Quoting "Christopher S. Aker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I've been experiencing erratic problems with bind 9.2.3 (bind-9.2.3-76) on
>> my SuSE 9.1 UML images. The host is running a stock SuSE 2.6.5 kernel
>> (2.6.5-7.111-smp) while the guest is running 2.6.7-1um. The software will
>> run for hours or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> How do I handle the "mtime mismatch (1079561920 vs 1102205165) of COW
> header vs backing file" issue? Should I "touch" the two files involved
> to match up mtimes? Ideas?
That's a sanity check to make sure that you don't try to put a COW file over
a backing file which ha
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 04:51:06PM +0100, Franck wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Is anyone have a mini sarge base filesystem guest who's working with
> >>2.6.9 guest uml kernel.
> >
> >
> >>I have a sarge UML who's working very fine with 2.4.26 but, when i'm
> >>lauching the same with 2.6.9 guest, boot blo
Quoting Anthony Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting "Christopher S. Aker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I've been experiencing erratic problems with bind 9.2.3 (bind-9.2.3-76) on
my SuSE 9.1 UML images. The host is running a stock SuSE 2.6.5 kernel
(2.6.5-7.111-smp) while the guest is running 2.6.7-1um. The
And here is the cleaner version on gentoo.org.
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=1852877#1852877
Jason
We the willing, led by the unknowning, are doing the impossible, for the
ungrateful. We have done so much, for so long, with so little. We are now
qualified to do anything with not
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 11:38, Jason Clark wrote:
> Thanks for the tip on NPTL. I will be sure to add it to the clean version
> that Im working on now. I should have it done by the end of this week at
> the latest.
>
> Yeah, Stage1 assumes that you are in a chroot and that it has no need to
>
Hello,
i've a little problem this halt and reboot inside an UML.
When i'm typing "halt" or "reboot" command, i've this message "Power
down." but not reboot or halt :(
Reboot and halt work fine with 2.6.9-uml-bb4 guest kernel on
2.6.9-skas3-v7 host kernel :)
Thanks Blaisorblade ;)
++
---
Hey gang, just thought I would post this quick and dirty on how to build
gentoo from stage 1 inside of a 2.6.9-bb4 UML. BTW, the bb4 patch seems
to be really solid. I haven't run into a single issue with it thus far.
I have a script that builds a stage1-gentoo inside a chroot on the host.
That
Cool. Thanks again for the heads up. I was thinking of tackling lfs6 and
perhaps hlfs. I have been following it since it started up and I think it
just might be a sweet little uml host and guest.
Jason
We the willing, led by the unknowning, are doing the impossible, for the
ungrateful. W
Hallo,
Ich habe einen Samba-Server in meiner UML laufen.
Die UML lädt ein Verzeichnis mittels hostfs.
Dieses möchte ich nun mit Samba in meinem LAN zur Verfügung stellen.
Ich kann es auch mounten aber nur davon lesen! Schreiben geht nicht.
Kann man hostfs-Filesysteme nicht mit Samba rw zur Verfü
very true, inside a chroot is faster. But building inside a UML sure was
fun
Jason
We the willing, led by the unknowning, are doing the impossible, for the
ungrateful. We have done so much, for so long, with so little. We are now
qualified to do anything with nothing.
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004
Hi,
I've noticed that quite a few of the patches that have gone into Linus'
tree lately seem related to the x86_64 arch.
Are we going to have working 64bit guest kernels in 2.6.10?
(I am not even asking about skas3 for this arch, although it would be a
very welcome development!)
Also, whilst we a
Hi,
I've noticed that quite a few of the patches that have gone into Linus'
tree lately seem related to the x86_64 arch.
Are we going to have working 64bit guest kernels in 2.6.10?
(I am not even asking about skas3 for this arch, although it would be a
very welcome development!)
Also, whilst we a
28 matches
Mail list logo
