On Wednesday 25 January 2006 18:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
First - below there's a reasonable diagnosis of what was your problem. In
short the problem wasn't the bridge, but the fact that the ping request
wasn't routed to the bridge but directly to et
Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Guess probably not. The only problem may be if you used the
> automatic uml_net setup and it does the wrong thing for your
> special case.
Yeah, you guessed right. I just figured it out--thanks for your
help! I set up the tap devices in advace manually
On Monday 23 January 2006 17:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just posted about this issue to comp.os.linux.networking, but
> it occurs to me that this may be a UML issue,
Guess probably not. The only problem may be if you used the automatic uml_net
setup and it does the wrong thing for your spec
