On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:38:51PM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>> The article describes nothing that is not also doable with KVM these days.
>> Anyway, UML is fun and nice to use. :-)
>
> Doesn't KVM require the extra VM CPU features?
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:38:51PM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> The article describes nothing that is not also doable with KVM these days.
> Anyway, UML is fun and nice to use. :-)
Doesn't KVM require the extra VM CPU features? For older CPU's, I thought
UML was more efficient.
Am I a
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:04 PM, James roben wrote:
> All,
>
> I recently read an article in Linux Journal 2012 July issue about UML (
> http://www.linuxjournaldigital.com/linuxjournal/201207?pg=60#pg60 ). I
> really came to know the
> power of UML. The first thing , i did was to subscrib
