On Tuesday 20 February 2007 08:48, kewlemer wrote:
> On 2/4/07, Haywood Floyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thus,
> >
> > for host kernel: 2.6.15 version
> > for guest (uml) kernel: 2.6.20 version
>
> Though I haven't tested it extensively, this combination is working
> fine for me. Nice to see th
On 2/4/07, Haywood Floyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus,
>
> for host kernel: 2.6.15 version
> for guest (uml) kernel: 2.6.20 version
>
Though I haven't tested it extensively, this combination is working
fine for me. Nice to see that 2.6.20 no longer needs the UML kernel
patch. The last time I u
