Le Vendredi, 10 Juin 2011 15:12:00 -0500,
clow...@clownix.net a écrit :
> I have made machines with make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 on debian squeeze
> and on ubuntu natty with kernel 2.6.39 but I am sure that the
> 2.6.39.1 works also.
> You can try the machines at clownix.net.
> Also in the downloadab
Hello Ianas,
I have made machines with make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386 on debian squeeze and
on ubuntu natty with kernel 2.6.39 but I am sure that the 2.6.39.1 works
also.
You can try the machines at clownix.net.
Also in the downloadable cloonix there are scripts to help create uml
machines, kernel and f
Le Samedi, 11 Juin 2011 01:39:12 +0700,
Antoine Martin a écrit :
> make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386
Make I take the opportunity to ask which kernel would be currently
recommended to use ?
Thanks again.
--
EditLive Enterprise
Le Samedi, 11 Juin 2011 01:39:12 +0700,
Antoine Martin a écrit :
> > x86_64 machine to run UML with a 32-bit UML file system ? I
> > haven't seen any kernel option that allows to specify both ARCH
> > 'um' *and* a 32-bit arch to allow compiling on a x86_64 machine.
> make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386
On 06/11/2011 01:33 AM, lanas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if the only way to run a 32-bit UML on a x86_64
> is to compile the UML kernel (ARCH=um) on a 32 bit machine (virtual
> machine for instance) and then use that kernel on the x86_64 machine to
> run UML with a 32-bit UML file
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Jeff Dike
Enviado el: lunes, 07 de julio de 2008 18:38
Para: David Fernández
CC: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto: Re: [uml-user] Running UML over Vmware
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 07:27:44PM +0200, David Fernández wrote:
> Any hint ab
On 7 Jul 2008, Jeff Dike told this:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 07:27:44PM +0200, David Fernández wrote:
>> Any hint about the cause of this big performance difference? Should
>> the installation of the SKAS3/4 patch on the host help to solve it?
>
> skas4 will certainly help. I get ~86% of nativ
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 07:27:44PM +0200, David Fernández wrote:
> Any hint about the cause of this big performance difference? Should
> the installation of the SKAS3/4 patch on the host help to solve it?
skas4 will certainly help. I get ~86% of native performance on a
kernel build with the lat
2008/7/5 David Fernández <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am making some tests running UML inside an Ubuntu-8.04-jeos running over
> Vmware ESX, but the performance I get is very poor compared to running UML
> directly over a native Ubuntu.
>
> For example, starting a virtual machine takes almo
te:
> From: clowncoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [uml-user] running uml under colinux on windows
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Friday, February 22, 2008, 11:48 AM
> I would be very interested in the result of this experimen
Hi,
I made some experiments some months ago with VNUML over a Fedora 8 based
coLinux image and I had some problems (virtual machines did not started; I
did not have time to investigate why).
After reading your mail I found some time to try it again, this time with a
Debian image, and everything w
I would be very interested in the result of this experiment!
Christopher Marshall wrote:
> Has anyone tried this?
>
> I have to run windows on my workstation at work but need root access to
> several linux instances to run networking experiments.
>
> My preferred way to do that would be to run u
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone tried this?
>
> I have to run windows on my workstation at work but need root access to
> several linux instances to run networking experiments.
>
> My preferred way to do that would be to run uml instances under a single
> colinux running under windows o
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 01:04, mohit tewari wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Is it possible to run uml under valgrind? I've seen posts from Jeff Dike
> dated 2002 stating that it has been done, but when I run the current uml
> version (linux-2.6.19-rc5
> & FedoraCore5-x86-root_fs) with valgrind 3.1.1, on
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 08:44, Dinesh Kannan wrote:
> Hi friends
>
> I want to know whether I can able to run 2.6 based UML kernel over a 2.4
> based host kernel. I still use the Red Hat 9.0 distribution with the kernel
> 2.4.20-8. Will I will be able to run a 2.6 based UML kernel on it. Pl
> I'd like to run the uml machine on the second external ip, with eth0
> inside the uml has one of the available external ips.
I solved that with NAT in iptables on the host machine:
hydra:~# iptables -t nat -L -n
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destina
Hello,
Am Donnerstag, 23. Juni 2005 13:52 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hello, I have a host that has one internal, and one external nic, with two
> available external ips.
> I'd like to run the uml machine on the second external ip, with eth0
> inside the uml has one of the available external ip
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I have a host that has one internal, and one external nic, with two
available external ips.
I'd like to run the uml machine on the second external ip, with eth0
inside the uml has one of the available external ips.
I haven't been able to fi
18 matches
Mail list logo
