Similarly to this, I have been running uml_switch with directly specified subnets as follows:
uml_switch -unix ./s0
uml_switch -unix ./s1
and so forth, where each of ./s0, ./s1, etc. provide a specific connection.
I can then connect various interfaces to the appropriate sockets at start time
On Saturday 11 March 2006 23:08, Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:
> Blaisorblade schreef:
> > That's possible, but you need to make UML use the daemon transport, and
> > run uml_switch beforehand, connecting it to a pre-setup tap0 device. See
> > the main page for more info (http://user-mode-linux.sour
On Saturday 11 March 2006 23:12, Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:
> Jim Carter schreef:
> > With many guests on one host, remember that the CPU is shared, and if
> > several guests get CPU-intensive at the same time their individual
> > performance will drop off. Also UMLs take a lot of memory; be sur
Jim Carter schreef:
With many guests on one host, remember that the CPU is shared, and if
several guests get CPU-intensive at the same time their individual
performance will drop off. Also UMLs take a lot of memory; be sure there's
enough.
Do UMLs really take a lot of extra memory? I'm using a
Blaisorblade schreef:
That's possible, but you need to make UML use the daemon transport, and run
uml_switch beforehand, connecting it to a pre-setup tap0 device. See the main
page for more info (http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/ -> Virtual
networking).
Thanks for the tip. Seems to be wo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> My goal is to have one subnet on tap0 in which all the UMLs are too, so
>> you get one big virtual ethernet network.
>
> That's possible, but you need to make UML use the daemon transport, and run
> uml_switch beforehand, connecting it to a pre-setup tap0 device. See the
On Friday 10 March 2006 17:49, Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if it was possible to have multiple UMLs share a single
> tap device.
You can, but not the way you're trying.
> My goal is to have one subnet on tap0 in which all the UMLs are too, so
> you get one big virtual e
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Julius Schwartzenberg wrote:
> I was wondering if it was possible to have multiple UMLs share a single
> tap device. My goal is to have one subnet on tap0 in which all the UMLs
> are too, so you get one big virtual ethernet network.
I doubt it's possible, since each UML nee
