On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 03:31:06PM +0400, Serge Goodenko wrote:
> Yes, I tried kernel 2.6.16.1 and that helped, thanks...
>
> frankly a bit tired of porting my modifications to newer kernels... )
> well, at least I keep feeling myself in the thick of things..
2.6.13 was quite a while ago, and UML
>
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 08:30:19PM +0400, Serge Goodenko wrote:
> > UML kernel version 2.6.13-4 with built-in UML running in SKAS3
> > mode. I don't know whether UML code itself has any versioning... host
> > kernel is 2.6.13-15, if it matters.. )
>
> Can you try something newer, to see if
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 08:30:19PM +0400, Serge Goodenko wrote:
> UML kernel version 2.6.13-4 with built-in UML running in SKAS3
> mode. I don't know whether UML code itself has any versioning... host
> kernel is 2.6.13-15, if it matters.. )
Can you try something newer, to see if this is somethin
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:34:58PM +0400, Serge Goodenko wrote:
> > the problem is when I ping any net1 host from any net0 host I get
> > about 90% packet loss and 'tcpdump -x' started on router eth1 device
> > shows the following packets (which are obviously corrupted):
>
> And the same pingin
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:34:58PM +0400, Serge Goodenko wrote:
> the problem is when I ping any net1 host from any net0 host I get
> about 90% packet loss and 'tcpdump -x' started on router eth1 device
> shows the following packets (which are obviously corrupted):
And the same pinging from net1
Hi all!
I configured a virtual network using UML kernels and i got some problems.
My network consists of two virtual subnets and a virtual router connecting them.
first net has 192.168.0.x hosts (net0)
second net has 192.168.1.x hosts (net1)
router has eth0 = 192.168.0.1 and eth1 = 192.168.1.1
