Re: [uml-user] ubd device naming

2005-03-31 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 24 March 2005 23:14, Jelle Boomstra wrote: > On Thursday 24 March 2005 22:57, Jim Carter wrote: > > The only problem is, there's no easy way on the host to mount a partition > > (that I know of).  You need a working UML, and you temporarily attach the > > image file to it and do your th

Re: [uml-user] ubd device naming

2005-03-24 Thread Jelle Boomstra
On Thursday 24 March 2005 22:57, Jim Carter wrote: > The only problem is, there's no easy way on the host to mount a partition > (that I know of).  You need a working UML, and you temporarily attach the > image file to it and do your thing. Blaisorblade posted a handy script here a while back that

Re: [uml-user] ubd device naming

2005-03-24 Thread Jim Carter
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Zev Benjamin wrote: > a 2.6.10 UML, that file shows devices with names like ubda and ubdb1. Under a > 2.4.27 UML, that file shows devices with names like ubd/disc0/disk and > ubd/disc1/part1. The problem is that I'm trying to do the install under > 2.6.10 (afs drivers don't

Re: [uml-user] ubd device naming

2005-03-23 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 21 March 2005 04:06, Zev Benjamin wrote: > Hi, > I've been wrestling with getting UML to run under an installer > (Linux/Athena), and I've run into some ubd naming issues. The installer > looks at /proc/partitions to ensure that you've entered a valid > partition name. Under a 2.6.10 UM

Re: [uml-user] ubd device naming

2005-03-20 Thread Frank Sorenson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zev Benjamin wrote: | Hi, | I've been wrestling with getting UML to run under an installer | (Linux/Athena), and I've run into some ubd naming issues. The installer | looks at /proc/partitions to ensure that you've entered a valid | partition name. Un

[uml-user] ubd device naming

2005-03-20 Thread Zev Benjamin
Hi, I've been wrestling with getting UML to run under an installer (Linux/Athena), and I've run into some ubd naming issues. The installer looks at /proc/partitions to ensure that you've entered a valid partition name. Under a 2.6.10 UML, that file shows devices with names like ubda and ubdb1