Re: [uml-user] tls patch

2005-05-11 Thread Nix
On Tue, 10 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tuesday 10 May 2005 17:23, Nix wrote: >> Indeed: configuring glibc with --without-__thread, putting the result in >> /lib/tls, and linking its dynamic linker into /lib yields an NPTL >> installation that works on i586 without trouble. > >> The onl

Re: [uml-user] tls patch

2005-05-10 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 17:23, Nix wrote: > On Tue, 10 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mused: > > Exporting in the environment LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 should also work, and > > is a bit more reliable in theory (because a distro *could* compile > > /lib/tls to even work on i486, I've heard; since no distr

Re: [uml-user] tls patch

2005-05-10 Thread Nix
On Tue, 10 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mused: > Exporting in the environment LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 should also work, and is > a > bit more reliable in theory (because a distro *could* compile /lib/tls to > even work on i486, I've heard; since no distro does it, this remains > theory). Indeed

Re: [uml-user] tls patch

2005-05-10 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 13:30, Gerd Knorr wrote: > Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I remember there was a patch for uml, changing the architecture to > > > i586, forcing glibc not to use /lib/tls. > > > > > > Someone knows where I can find it ? > > > > It's in > > http://www.suse.de/~

Re: [uml-user] tls patch

2005-05-10 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 14:21, Peter wrote: > Note, you can prevent /lib/tls from becoming an issue on apt-get upgrade > by using dpkg-divert. e.g. per the debian script here: > http://downloads.rimuhosting.com/debiantls.sh > > But hopefully this will be a moot point shortly after Blaisorblade > re

Re: [uml-user] tls patch

2005-05-10 Thread Peter
Note, you can prevent /lib/tls from becoming an issue on apt-get upgrade by using dpkg-divert. e.g. per the debian script here: http://downloads.rimuhosting.com/debiantls.sh But hopefully this will be a moot point shortly after Blaisorblade releases those tls patches be mentioned a week or so

Re: [uml-user] tls patch

2005-05-10 Thread Gerd Knorr
Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I remember there was a patch for uml, changing the architecture to i586, > > forcing glibc not to use /lib/tls. > > > > Someone knows where I can find it ? > It's in > http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/uml/patches/ > named uml-pretend-to-be-i586 (browse the ap

Re: [uml-user] tls patch

2005-05-10 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 10 May 2005 12:02, Sebastian Böhm wrote: > Hi, > > I remember there was a patch for uml, changing the architecture to i586, > forcing glibc not to use /lib/tls. > > Someone knows where I can find it ? It's in http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/uml/patches/ named uml-pretend-to-be-i586 (browse th

[uml-user] tls patch

2005-05-10 Thread Sebastian Böhm
Hi, I remember there was a patch for uml, changing the architecture to i586, forcing glibc not to use /lib/tls. Someone knows where I can find it ? The thing is: if I do a 'apt-get upgrade' I have a good chance that the system is half-dead after then. Or is there another way of disableing tls,