On Wednesday 09 February 2005 19:31, Paul Warren wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 09:08:08AM -0800, Anthony Brock wrote:
> > >>> Paul Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/09/05 07:12AM >>>
> > >
> > > Right, but the memory is mmapped to that file. My understanding is
> >
> > that
> >
> > > the memory wil
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 18:08, Anthony Brock wrote:
> >>> Paul Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/09/05 07:12AM >>>
> >
> > Right, but the memory is mmapped to that file. My understanding is
>
> that
>
> > the memory will only be synced with the disk when either (a) msync
>
> (or
>
> > munmap) ge
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 22:01, Anthony Brock wrote:
> Paul Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/09/05 10:31AM >>>
> > We've disabled this. Having searched the archives, I believe the
> > summary is:
> >
> > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBD_SYNC == YES => All I/O is synchronous and slow
> > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_U
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 16:12, Paul Warren wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 03:20:11PM +0100, Hegedus Gabor wrote:
> > 2005-02-09, sze keltezéssel 14:13-kor Paul Warren ezt írta:
> > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:59:50PM +0100, Andreas Wohlfeld wrote:
> > > > Patch your host with skas and see
Paul Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/09/05 10:31AM >>>
> A delay. My original question was, does using tempfs do more than
> prevent the memory from getting swapped out? We have developed a
patch
> that mlock()s the memory (using a setuid helper app), and thus
should
> stop it from getting swa
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 09:08:08AM -0800, Anthony Brock wrote:
> >>> Paul Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/09/05 07:12AM >>>
> > Right, but the memory is mmapped to that file. My understanding is
> that
> > the memory will only be synced with the disk when either (a) msync
> (or
> > munmap) gets call
>>> Paul Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/09/05 07:12AM >>>
> Right, but the memory is mmapped to that file. My understanding is
that
> the memory will only be synced with the disk when either (a) msync
(or
> munmap) gets called or (b) the kernel has nothing better to do.
> I'm assuming that (a) doe
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 03:20:11PM +0100, Hegedus Gabor wrote:
> 2005-02-09, sze keltezéssel 14:13-kor Paul Warren ezt írta:
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:59:50PM +0100, Andreas Wohlfeld wrote:
> > > Patch your host with skas and see that the temp files go to a tempfs
> > > mount point (or mount /
