On Wednesday 19 October 2005 10:28, Fabio wrote:
> Hi!
> in http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade I found only patches , not
> kernel um to download.
> What's wrong? this isn't your homepage?
Yes, that's my homepage, and I ship patches indeed. I don't ship binary
kernels at the moment, sor
On 10/19/05, Fabio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
> in http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade I found only patches , not
> kernel um to download.
>
> What's wrong? this isn't your homepage?
It is. You'll have to compile your kernel.
--
Homepage : http://geocities.com/arhuaco
The first pr
Hi!
in http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade I found only patches , not
kernel um to download.
What's wrong? this isn't your homepage?
Fabio
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 10:03, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 October 2005 09:40, Fabio wrote:
> > Hi!
> > I've another question: can I
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 09:40, Fabio wrote:
> Hi!
> I've another question: can I use a kernel 2.4 (for um) on a kernel 2.6
> (host)?
Yes, it's possible. But it must be a recent kernel. If you use 2.4.28-bs2
(from my homepage), it works. If you use 2.4.24-1um, it doesn't.
The fix was merged i
Hi!
I've another question: can I use a kernel 2.4 (for um) on a kernel 2.6 (host)?
Many thanks,
Fabio
--
Dott. Fabio Marcone
2T srl
Telefono+39 - 0871- 540154
Fax +39 - 0871- 571594
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Indirizzo Viale B. Croce 573, 66013 Chieti Scalo (CH)
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 21:04, Ian McDonald wrote:
> Yes it is GCC specific but if you remove the double up of the enum
> define in sys_call_table.c it will work for ALL versions
Correct, just that 2.6.11 almost works for almost everyone. Actually the bug
you hit is not compilation-only, sadl
On Monday 21 March 2005 23:46, Ian McDonald wrote:
> Sorry - should have said I documented the issues I found for 2.6.11 on
> the user-mode-linux-devel list not the user list - I find that really
> good for info about what runs where...
I'm not seeing your messages anywhere - can you recall what we
Paolo,
I appreciate all the work that you put in for making UML usable - it
makes my life (and others I am sure) easier. Sames goes for work Jeff
does.
> With the patch above, I don't think it can compile (fstatfs64 is still
> duplicated).
>
> Also, there are a bit of other problems (some not c
Yes it is GCC specific but if you remove the double up of the enum
define in sys_call_table.c it will work for ALL versions
I presume you have read both things... e-mail below in case you haven't
OK after much further investigation, redownloading of source
(2.6.11.4) and looking at what
On Monday 21 March 2005 23:46, Ian McDonald wrote:
> Sorry - should have said I documented the issues I found for 2.6.11 on
> the user-mode-linux-devel list not the user list - I find that really
> good for info about what runs where...
Sorry for my previous mail - I just found your report. Still,
I would think that you would have better luck with FC3 and a
relatively new compiler.
I have tested 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 now on an older host kernel (and
published fixes for 2.6.11) so newers ones should be fine if not
you can read my posts as to how to fix 2.6.11. I will play with UML on
my FC3
Sorry - should have said I documented the issues I found for 2.6.11 on
the user-mode-linux-devel list not the user list - I find that really
good for info about what runs where...
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:45:31 +1200, Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would think that you would have bette
Hello all,
I am running kernel 2.6.8 on FC3 and I am wondering which 2.6 kernels I
can run under user mode linux. Seems that some of them do not compile
from reading the mailing list. I am using gcc 3.3.4 and I have
installed the user mode linux utilities rpm from the website. Thanks, --
Jonathan
13 matches
Mail list logo
