On 3/31/08, Raul Lopez Nevot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can anyone please tell me what I'm missing.
>
>
> You have not the correct loadable modules for your kernel.
> If you have compiled your brand new kernel, with ARCH=um (I guess
> because it's last version), mount your root file system on
> Can anyone please tell me what I'm missing.
You have not the correct loadable modules for your kernel.
If you have compiled your brand new kernel, with ARCH=um (I guess
because it's last version), mount your root file system on host
machine (mount root_fs /mnt -o loop), and install the modules c
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:57:16PM -0700, kewlemer wrote:
> iptables -L gives the following error -
> -bash-3.2# iptables -L
> WARNING: Error inserting x_tables
> (/lib/modules/2.6.24/kernel/net/netfilter/x_tables.ko): Invalid module
> format
> FATAL: Error inserting ip_tables
> (/lib/modules/2.6.2
On 3/30/08, kewlemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running 2.6.24 UML kernel and Fedora AMD64 filesystem from
> http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/.
>
I forgot to add that its Fedora 8 AMD64 filesystem.
Thanks,
KM
-
Ch
Hi all,
I'm running 2.6.24 UML kernel and Fedora AMD64 filesystem from
http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/.
I have compiled all the netfilter and iptables options the 2.6.24
kernel provides.
I have also installed the iptables userspace program by simply doing a
"yum install iptables". The version installe
Haywood Floyd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I downloaded the debian 3.1 file system and debian 4.0 file system.
> After the uml boot, i typed at the shell prompt
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
> he replays with
> FATAL: Module ip_tables not found.
> iptables v1.3.6: can't initial
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:24:19AM -0700, Mathew Brown wrote:
> Sorry to bring this issue up again, but I was wondering if there was
> some wiki that could be updated to reflect things such at the TT
> issue? I'm sure that I'm not the only one that ran into this. If
> there is one, I woul
Hi,
Sorry to bring this issue up again, but I was wondering if there was
some wiki that could be updated to reflect things such at the TT
issue? I'm sure that I'm not the only one that ran into this. If
there is one, I wouldn't mind updating parts myself (with my limited
knowledge) :D
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 12:08:50PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Jeff, could you add to the "Tracing Thread mode" the (OBSOLETE) / (DEPRECATED
> mark so that users won't enable it?
Yeah, that's a good idea.
Jeff
-
On Sunday 20 August 2006 15:21, Mathew Brown wrote:
> Hi,
> If you mean by statically linked, CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y
Yes.
> , I tried it
> with 2.6.17-9 and it worked fine. Here's a diff between the .config
> file that I used for static linking (without TT) and when I tried to
> use TT (.
Hi,
If you mean by statically linked, CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y, I tried it
with 2.6.17-9 and it worked fine. Here's a diff between the .config
file that I used for static linking (without TT) and when I tried to
use TT (.configwithttthatsegfaults). If you'd like, I can send you
the actual .
On Sunday 20 August 2006 11:37, Mathew Brown wrote:
> Hi,
> I think I solved it. I also think that I found a bug. Here's what I
> did and why I think it's a bug:
>
> I thought the problem might be related to 2.6.17-9 so I downloaded
> 2.6.16 and compiled it. It's behavior was different b
Hi,
I think I solved it. I also think that I found a bug. Here's what I
did and why I think it's a bug:
I thought the problem might be related to 2.6.17-9 so I downloaded
2.6.16 and compiled it. It's behavior was different but it still
wouldn't boot. It would give me the following:
Thanks. I added stderr=1 to the kernel line and it gives me the
following:
io scheduler noop registered
io scheduler anticipatory registered
io scheduler deadline registered
io scheduler cfq registered (default)
Kernel panic - not syncing: Segfault with no mm
<6>Stopping all CPUs...done
EIP: 00
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 11:58:44AM -0700, Mathew Brown wrote:
> Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK
> Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
> Checking advanced syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
> Checking for tmpfs mount on /dev/shm...OK
> Checking PROT_EXEC mm
Thanks. I downloaded the latest stable kernel (2.6.17-9) and enabled
most options (I build in everything inside the kernel instead of
modules). However, when I tried running it, it would give me the
following and then exit:
Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK
Checking syscal
On Friday 18 August 2006 21:34, Mathew Brown wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm currently using the 2.6.17-rc1 UML kernel provided at
> http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/new/ However, when attempting
> to use iptables:
>
> iptables -L
>
> I get the following error: iptables v1.2.11: can't initialize i
Hi,
I'm currently using the 2.6.17-rc1 UML kernel provided at
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/new/ However, when attempting
to use iptables:
iptables -L
I get the following error: iptables v1.2.11: can't initialize iptables
table `filter': iptables who? (do you need to insmod?)
An
With "-t XXX" you select the TABLE to modify/view
To display the forward-chain you can just do
iptables -t filter -nvL FORWARD
("-t filter" is default and can be left out)
For example, to make uml reach the outside world and protect uml
against connections from outside you would do
thank you guys all.
2006/6/26, Christian Bockermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What's /etc/resolv.conf look like in your UML? You have to specify aname server here.Does your FORWARD-chain allow udp 53 from
192.168.0.0/24 to the
is this forward-chain of host ? i don't know how to ? iptables -t FOR
What's /etc/resolv.conf look like in your UML? You have to specify a
name server here.
Does your FORWARD-chain allow udp 53 from 192.168.0.0/24 to the
nameservers you have in /etc/resolv.conf?
Greets,
Chris
Am 26.06.2006 um 15:52 schrieb paul john:
> in host , i use "iptables -t nat -A
On Monday 26 June 2006 15:52, paul john wrote:
> in host , i use "iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j
> MASQUERADE" to enable umls accessing the world . but can't resolve domain
> name , if you just give a ip , in umls can ping out the world .but if give
> a domain name , can't , i
in host , i use "iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j MASQUERADE" to enable umls accessing the world . but can't resolve domain name , if you just give a ip , in umls can ping out the world .but if give a domain name , can't , i don't know what's problem .
please .
-- skype id (flo
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 03:22:08PM +0100, robl wrote:
Dear Rob,,
>
> I'm looking for some help/advice on setting up a firewall for my uml host
> machine. Specifically, I'm using tuntap and have eth0 listening promisc with
> br0 having the public internet facing ip. I then have tap (0,1,2) interf
Hi,
I'm looking for some help/advice on setting up a firewall for my uml host
machine. Specifically, I'm using tuntap and have eth0 listening promisc with
br0 having the public internet facing ip. I then have tap (0,1,2) interfaces
for each uml guest. I'd like to firewall the host machine so on
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 16:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, i would like to use Iptables on my UML guest.
> When i use :
> iptables -L
> i have this output:
>
> ip_tables: version magic '2.6.8-1-686 preempt 686 gcc-3.3' should be
> '2.6.9-bb4 gcc-3.3' FATAL: Error inserting ip_tables
> (/lib/m
Hi, i would like to use Iptables on my UML
guest.
When i use :
iptables -L
i have this output:
ip_tables: version magic '2.6.8-1-686 preempt 686
gcc-3.3' should be '2.6.9-bb4 gcc-3.3'FATAL: Error inserting ip_tables
(/lib/modules/2.6.8-1-686/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.ko): Invalid
27 matches
Mail list logo
