On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
by the way pcap gives some errors on x86_64 but builds, but on i386 it
crashes the build.
The pcap code is correct for both cases.
I guess you've been in a hurry - on i386 likely you don't have libpcap-devel
(or such) installed (you also need libpcap.a
On Saturday 25 March 2006 01:33, David Lang wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Saturday 25 March 2006 00:45, David Lang wrote:
> >> to test my compile environment I copies the config from your kernel to
> >> my dev box, did a make ARCH=um oldconfig (accepting all the defaults)
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Saturday 25 March 2006 00:45, David Lang wrote:
to test my compile environment I copies the config from your kernel to my
dev box, did a make ARCH=um oldconfig (accepting all the defaults) and
tested the results.
You did that in the 32-bit chroot, r
On Saturday 25 March 2006 00:45, David Lang wrote:
> to test my compile environment I copies the config from your kernel to my
> dev box, did a make ARCH=um oldconfig (accepting all the defaults) and
> tested the results.
You did that in the 32-bit chroot, right? I wouldn't expect the config to
c
to test my compile environment I copies the config from your kernel to my
dev box, did a make ARCH=um oldconfig (accepting all the defaults) and
tested the results.
it worked, so the problem is somewhere in the differences between your
kernel config and mine (trimmed diff in the mail I'm reply
On Thursday 23 March 2006 08:15, David Lang wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 March 2006 00:55, David Lang wrote:
> > That's _required_ but not enough; to run a 32-bit UML binary you _need_
> > that support on the host.
> yep, I didn't realize it was missing bef
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, David Lang wrote:
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, David Lang wrote:
Btw, you can also download pre-built UML binaries from my homepage (see
signature), and this is useful even to determine what's going on (e.g. say
that binary work, your one doesn't, let's compare configurations! Or
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, David Lang wrote:
Btw, you can also download pre-built UML binaries from my homepage (see
signature), and this is useful even to determine what's going on (e.g. say
that binary work, your one doesn't, let's compare configurations! Or a
couple
of months ago the answer was "
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Thursday 23 March 2006 00:55, David Lang wrote:
is there a way to build a i386 uml kernal on amd64?
I have a 64 bit debian build on my main box, but I need to run a uml
instance useing a 32 bit debian system image. I've attempted to use the
same um
> is there a way to build a i386 uml kernal on amd64?
make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386
Antoine
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thursday 23 March 2006 00:55, David Lang wrote:
> is there a way to build a i386 uml kernal on amd64?
> I have a 64 bit debian build on my main box, but I need to run a uml
> instance useing a 32 bit debian system image. I've attempted to use the
> same uml kernel that I have been useing for my
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, David Lang wrote:
compiling a uml kernel on a i386 and trying to run in resulted in 'file not
found' (shared libraries not there for the 32 bit software on the 64 bit
system). so I did a chroot into a directory with a 32 bit system image in it
and attempted to run the ia32
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, David Lang wrote:
is there a way to build a i386 uml kernal on amd64?
I have a 64 bit debian build on my main box, but I need to run a uml instance
useing a 32 bit debian system image. I've attempted to use the same uml
kernel that I have been useing for my earlier attemp
is there a way to build a i386 uml kernal on amd64?
I have a 64 bit debian build on my main box, but I need to run a uml
instance useing a 32 bit debian system image. I've attempted to use the
same uml kernel that I have been useing for my earlier attempts, but it
dies with an oops complaining
14 matches
Mail list logo
