Re: [uml-user] hostfs permissions problems

2005-04-16 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 04 April 2005 11:24, Jan Rychter wrote: > Blaisorblade wrote: > > On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote: > > > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive > > > my UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems > > > (updates requir

Re: [uml-user] hostfs permissions problems

2005-04-10 Thread Blaisorblade
On Saturday 09 April 2005 17:49, Anthony Brock wrote: > Quoting Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Rather than use hostfs, I've been using NFS to mount my home on various > > umls - it gives me more flexibility to move the uml to a machine with > > more horsepower if I want to without shagging o

Re: [uml-user] hostfs permissions problems

2005-04-09 Thread Anthony Brock
Quoting Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Rather than use hostfs, I've been using NFS to mount my home on various umls - it gives me more flexibility to move the uml to a machine with more horsepower if I want to without shagging out the setup. If you can get TunTap working with 2.4 then this is a

Re: [uml-user] hostfs permissions problems

2005-04-09 Thread Dave Pearson
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 11:54 +0200, Jan Rychter wrote: > [...two UML problems reported: one with hostfs and one with TCP over TAP...] > > It's been several days of silence -- so, I'll ask -- should I: > > a) supply more information, > b) wait patiently as things will get better, > c) give up

Re: [uml-user] hostfs permissions problems

2005-04-09 Thread Jan Rychter
[...two UML problems reported: one with hostfs and one with TCP over TAP...] It's been several days of silence -- so, I'll ask -- should I: a) supply more information, b) wait patiently as things will get better, c) give up on UML alltogether? thanks, --J. --

Re: [uml-user] hostfs permissions problems

2005-04-06 Thread Jan Rychter
Blaisorblade wrote: > On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:01, Jan Rychter wrote: > > > Blaisorblade wrote: > > > > On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote: > > > > > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive > > > > > my UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a

Re: [uml-user] hostfs permissions problems

2005-04-05 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:01, Jan Rychter wrote: > > Blaisorblade wrote: > > > On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote: > > > > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive > > > > my UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems > > > > (upd

Re: [uml-user] hostfs permissions problems

2005-04-05 Thread Jan Rychter
> Blaisorblade wrote: > > On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote: > > > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my > > > UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems > > > (updates required for newer host kernels, non-working hostfs, etc

Re: [uml-user] hostfs permissions problems

2005-04-04 Thread Jan Rychter
Blaisorblade wrote: > On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote: > > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my > > UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems > > (updates required for newer host kernels, non-working hostfs, etc). > > >

[uml-user] hostfs permissions problems

2005-04-03 Thread Jan Rychter
I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems (updates required for newer host kernels, non-working hostfs, etc). I am now at a stage where I have linux-2.4.27 patched with uml-2.4.27-bs2-pre7.patch and a

Re: [uml-user] hostfs permissions problems

2005-04-03 Thread Blaisorblade
On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote: > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my > UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems > (updates required for newer host kernels, non-working hostfs, etc). > I am now at a stage where I have