On Monday 04 April 2005 11:24, Jan Rychter wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive
> > > my UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems
> > > (updates requir
On Saturday 09 April 2005 17:49, Anthony Brock wrote:
> Quoting Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Rather than use hostfs, I've been using NFS to mount my home on various
> > umls - it gives me more flexibility to move the uml to a machine with
> > more horsepower if I want to without shagging o
Quoting Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Rather than use hostfs, I've been using NFS to mount my home on various
umls - it gives me more flexibility to move the uml to a machine with
more horsepower if I want to without shagging out the setup. If you can
get TunTap working with 2.4 then this is a
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 11:54 +0200, Jan Rychter wrote:
> [...two UML problems reported: one with hostfs and one with TCP over TAP...]
>
> It's been several days of silence -- so, I'll ask -- should I:
>
> a) supply more information,
> b) wait patiently as things will get better,
> c) give up
[...two UML problems reported: one with hostfs and one with TCP over TAP...]
It's been several days of silence -- so, I'll ask -- should I:
a) supply more information,
b) wait patiently as things will get better,
c) give up on UML alltogether?
thanks,
--J.
--
Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:01, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > > Blaisorblade wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > > > > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive
> > > > > my UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:01, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > Blaisorblade wrote:
> > > On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > > > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive
> > > > my UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems
> > > > (upd
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my
> > > UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems
> > > (updates required for newer host kernels, non-working hostfs, etc
Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my
> > UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems
> > (updates required for newer host kernels, non-working hostfs, etc).
>
> >
I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my
UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems
(updates required for newer host kernels, non-working hostfs, etc).
I am now at a stage where I have linux-2.4.27 patched with
uml-2.4.27-bs2-pre7.patch and a
On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote:
> I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my
> UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems
> (updates required for newer host kernels, non-working hostfs, etc).
> I am now at a stage where I have
11 matches
Mail list logo
