I have learned that the newest linux kernel supported by the usb (hdc-uml)
patch is the 2.4.19. Aparently since that version the usb
API/framework/thing/model inside the kernel have changed in a way that the
patch was driven ineffective.
I didn try it with newer kernels yet.
Maybe tomorrow
On Monday 24 October 2005 23:05, Antoine Martin wrote:
> > I've advanced a little more in running 2.4.19 on 2.6.x...
> > Aparently the exec-shield and randomize_va_space that comes plugged on
> > fedo=
> > ra weren't helping.
>
> I don't know about randomize_va_space, but exec-shield has never caus
> I've advanced a little more in running 2.4.19 on 2.6.x...
> Aparently the exec-shield and randomize_va_space that comes plugged on
> fedo=
> ra weren't helping.
I don't know about randomize_va_space, but exec-shield has never caused
me any problems running uml in skas3 or skas0
> With exec-shiel
I've advanced a little more in running 2.4.19 on 2.6.x...
Aparently the exec-shield and randomize_va_space that comes plugged on fedora
weren't helping.
With exec-shield and randomize_va_space ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ./linux ubd0=cow1,root_rh9.ext3
Checking for the skas3 patch in the host..
On Thursday 01 January 1970 00:59, Felipe Andres Manzano wrote:
> This is where I get
>
> ./linux
> Checking for the skas3 patch in the host...not found
> Checking for /proc/mm...not found
> Violación de segmento
>
> I did a quick dbg but didn't reach to the sigfault due to the sigtraps
> stopi
On Thursday 01 January 1970 01:00, Felipe Andres Manzano wrote:
> Something is something...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-uml-hdc]# gdb ./linux
> GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.1post-1.20040607.43rh)
> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public Li
Something is something...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-uml-hdc]# gdb ./linux
GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.1post-1.20040607.43rh)
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it und
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 18:00, Felipe Andres Manzano wrote:
> I think I didn't even get to that problem yet.
Yes, agreed.
> I put it in anyway without
> any success..
> I don't know if this info is usefull but the binary 2.4.19 uml release I've
> found don't work either on my 2.6.x host .-
F
I think I didn't even get to that problem yet. I put it in anyway without any
success..
I don't know if this info is usefull but the binary 2.4.19 uml release I've
found don't work either on my 2.6.x host .-
Thnks a lot!
F
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:10:51 +0200
Vincent guffens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've tried to disable the tls movin /lib/tld to /lib/tld.off.
I've attached the output of the compilation and the bare test.
And here ..
http://www.hosting321.com.ar/~loschico/patch-2.4.19-uml-hdc-cfg.bz2
there is a patch to the vanilla kernel 2.4.19 that construct what I'm using.
F
On Wed, 19
[...]
And aparently I can't use a kernel prior to 2.4.2x on a 2.6.x host. I
f..ed up, am I?
If you want to run a not so recent 2.4 guest on a 2.6 host you have to
apply a very small patch. The patch is as follows, it does not apply
properly, but it is easy enough to apply by hand
--- 1.
Buenas,
I need a RH9 root running in UML with the usb-hdc patch on it. I've
learned that the last uml-kernel that supports the usb is the 2.4.19.
Isn't it?
And aparently I can't use a kernel prior to 2.4.2x on a 2.6.x host. I
f..ed up, am I?
So the problem arise and this is what I did try ...
12 matches
Mail list logo
