On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 10:48:16AM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> > Half of all MAC-48 addresses are "locally administered": those with the
> > second-least-significant bit of the first byte set.
>
> Uh?
> Looking at the list of allocated OUI
> (http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/oui.txt), I s
Jason Lunz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:37:15AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
>
>>This address range is documented - look for assignment of MAC ranges
>>to NIC manufacturers. This range will be documented as reserved for
>>private use or something similar.
>
>
> Half of all MAC-48 addresses ar
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:37:15AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> This address range is documented - look for assignment of MAC ranges
> to NIC manufacturers. This range will be documented as reserved for
> private use or something similar.
Half of all MAC-48 addresses are "locally administered": thos
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 05:18:17PM +0100, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> I use UML with the tuntap virtual network driver. By default it uses
> ethernet fe:fd:xx:xx:xx:xx addresses. I asked google about those
> addresses with no success.
>
> Are these addresses allocated to anyone? Reserved for experime
Hi,
I use UML with the tuntap virtual network driver. By default it uses
ethernet fe:fd:xx:xx:xx:xx addresses. I asked google about those
addresses with no success.
Are these addresses allocated to anyone? Reserved for experimental use?
Reserved for private use? Is it documented somewhere?
Shoul
